I think you went off on a tangent. This is not what I was complaining about. Also, I do not have a problem with "gender stuff" - I just have a problem with a lack of objectivity.

[–] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

but this is what I complain about. but yeah, i went over the rails, you are right. you have a point.

in that other thread, i mean, where the crosspost is, they talked a lot about patriarchy and stuff.

and i wondered: if women in the past were hunting and thus using their skill like men do and yada yada, not gender roles like today and stuff, does that mean that there was no patriarchy back then?

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are tribal people that live in matriarchy. If that answers your question. Also, the amazons are not just a myth.

[–] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no, that does not answer my question. but thanks

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and i wondered: if women in the past were hunting and thus using their skill like men do and yada yada, not gender roles like today and stuff, does that mean that there was no patriarchy back then?

But you asked exactly that - and I gave you examples of women that "were hunting and thus using their skill" and there was no patriarchy in some of those systems - even into the present.

Also - let's be real - most men nowadays who talk about "men hunting" are fat slobs who couldn't hunt a chicken with a limp ;)

[–] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

No, i asked for the past. ancient times.

most men nowadays who talk about “men hunting” are fat slobs who couldn’t hunt a chicken with a limp ;)

thats sounds like anectdotal evidence ;-)