this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13937 readers
660 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The link is Elon's reply to the OP.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edge@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago (14 children)

That doesn't make it any harder for someone to harass you. They can't harass you if they can't interact with you.

And being worried about stalking is extremely counter to posting something publicly.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Wanting to post something publicly except to all the specific dipshits you took additional actions to not want to interact with seems like a pretty reasonable want.

Considering that's the exact moderation approach of the website were all on.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Considering that's the exact moderation approach of the website were all on.

Except it literally isn't? You can't block someone from seeing your posts on here.

[–] BioWarfarePosadist@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago

There's a level of anonymity here where OpSec is up to the user for the most part.

Twitter is much more connected to a lot of people's actual identities as it was also a space for organizations, businesses and other public figures to post to the general public, with these accounts being run mostly by the public figure themselves, and PR for the really rich people and orgs. As such protections on Twitter needed to be as broad as possible.

All fences are scalable and climbable, but as the other user was saying, it's good to make that climb harder for the bad actors in this scenario.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)