this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
115 points (96.7% liked)

okmatewanker

561 readers
32 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
bernieecclestoned@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk
115
Britain was not the... wealthiest of Roman conquests (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

It also required so many soldiers to keep that anyone put in charge of Britannia could take the legions to march on Rome and would have a chance of becoming the new emperor.