this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1308 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

5484 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hm, the tweet says they need to make a voting plan, not that they need to show that they've officially registered or voted. Loophole?

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Try giving that loophole explanation to a Trump appointed judge and see how far that gets you. Do not risk federal charges for this stupid shit.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try giving that loophole explanation to any reasonable and professional judge and see how far that gets you.

Flip the sides and I would be surprised if a Trump appointed judge didnt accept some kind of bullshit loophole like this.

I love CAH as much as the next degen but this feels iffy at best. But also they presumable ran this passed at least one lawyer who said ‘fuck it lets ball’ so maybe there is a leg to stand on here.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really do not think its worth gambling with federal charges over (up to*)$100, but if you're willing to risk it by all means, submit to their public shaming for a pittance, or implicate yourself by contributing. I just want people to know what they're getting into.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My guy, I’m agreeing with your point. This probably wouldn’t hold up as legal in court, but also IANAL.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

apologies, I misread. i'm maybe a little more annoyed about this than I realized.

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Trump appointed judges should just be ignored then.