Technology

60016 readers

2792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

346

RoboFlop: Tesla's Cybercab Event Torched By Analysts And Investors (insideevs.com)

submitted 2 months ago by AmbiguousProps to c/technology@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Investors, analysts and the general public seem deeply unimpressed with Tesla's robotaxi event earlier this week.
Tesla's stock closed down 8% on Friday, when it was supposed to be a propulsive event for the company.
CEO Elon Musk has vowed to make Tesla into an AI and robotics powerhouse, but proof of this plan feels in short supply.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Tesla should focus on fixing the quality of their current products before moving into other realms of production?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Eh, I think their current products are fine (except Cybertruck, that's ridiculous). Every company has recalls, and Tesla's are generally pretty mild (again, except Cybertruck).

The main issue is that Elon really likes to overpromise and underdeliver. If he would flip that, I think people would be a lot more excited about this event. But saying "start production in 2025, available in 2026" means nothing when he's been off by years with previous announcements. IMO, he shouldn't have had the event until there was a firm delivery date. And that doesn't just mean build capacity, they should be substantially far into the regulatory process before even presenting it publicly.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I think their current products are fine (except Cybertruck, that’s ridiculous). Every company has recalls, and Tesla’s are generally pretty mild (again, except Cybertruck).

Don't they famously have an issues with QC? It wasn't all that long that their other cars had problems with panel gaps, or manufacturing material left inside, etc.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

I mark panel gaps in the "minor" category. You're not going to die because your panels don't precisely line up like you would if your brakes fail, battery explodes, or steering failure.

Tesla has its problems, but mechanically, they've been pretty sound.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their current products are not fine, and he kills people when he acts like they are. FSD is nowhere near ready for the road. It wouldn't be such a problem if he wasn't such a bitch about using lidar.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

Sure, his messaging about FSD is absolutely dangerous and irresponsible, but mechanically, Tesla's cars have been quite solid.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They are not doing anything better than anyone else other than marketing, which is tied directly Musk. Every bowel movement of his gets headlines so he brings the attention, without him it is a dated looking car with poor build quality.

Instead of addressing the current sleight of products and updating them, Musk is constantly overpromising and pivoting which is causing this unfocused nonsense of products - Truck, taxi, van, robot...

But if they get rid of him, the company tanks because their bread and butter products are only ok.