this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
449 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

59574 readers
3685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 140 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ya it'll be a cold day in hell before Instagram requires men to hide their nipples. Just shows how ingrained America's views on sex, sexuality and gender are in Christianity.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 86 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Christian tradition, sure, but the Bible doesn't have much to say about nipples so any specific rule regarding them seems to be more of an inference than a command.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 57 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The Bible stopped being a real guide for American Christians the moment they landed on our coast

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Technically correct, because they weren't "American" before they landed.

They abandoned the Bible as a real guide long before that, though.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Isn’t the constitution the New New Testament.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't stop them from using it as the "reason" for several rules

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, and then uses Jesus' name in the same sentence as USA. The guy hated capitalism more than anything.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I read once that it had more to do with not seeing wealthy women's nipples. For example wealthy women would hire a wet nurse to breast feed their babies. It was a way to show off wealth and social standing. So the hired help in the form of a wet nurse could show her breasts, but her wealthy employer would not because its beneath her.

So not showing breasts, even for the purpose of breast feeding became affiliated with wealth and power, whereas the inverse was true, showing breasts meant you could not afford to keep them covered.

And that's not even including the influence of brothels and prostitution.

Let that cook for however many hundreds of years, mix in religion and you get whatever the fuck we have now.

It was an interesting theory and seemed to make sense to me. I'll have to try to find the article later. I read it maybe 10 years ago so it might take some looking.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Wikipedia article says historically wet nursing was available to all social classes, so that doesn't really jive.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

I wanted to find that article before I responded to you, but like I said it read about 10 years ago and not having much luck finding it.

But yes wetnurses were available to all women because not all women can produce breast milk.

If one poor woman's baby is starving it was not uncommon for a friend or sister to fulfill that role to help them. Women were pregnant more frequently due to no birthcontrol. So a woman lactating was more common. However they weren't hiring a wet nurse in the same way the wealthy were, and if a poor woman could feed her baby she would. A rich woman(almost) always hired a wet nurse regardless of her ability to produce milk.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What does the pope have to say about nipples? I've seen some in Christian art (didn't touch myself to these, just in case), but didn't realize there was an opinion on this?

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

The Catechism of the Catholic Church reads:

The forms taken by modesty vary from one culture to another. Everywhere, however, modesty exists as an intuition of the spiritual dignity proper to man. It is born with the awakening consciousness of being a subject. Teaching modesty to children and adolescents means awakening in them respect for the human person." (C.C.C. # 2524)

People here are not serious, they repeat slogans and polemics very superficially. The nipple taboo is found across pre-Christian and non-Abrahamic societies, probably because of breasts' association with fertility. I.e

When did bare breasts become taboo in Western civilization?

Probably around 3,000 years ago. Women are displayed with exposed breasts in Minoan artwork from 1500 B.C. Some historians believe that these ancient women went topless only during religious rituals—bare-breasted, buxom goddesses have been worshipped since the dawn of civilization—but some of the artworks depict everyday activities, suggesting that bare breasts may have been commonplace. Just across the Mediterranean, ancient Egyptian women sported elaborate dresses that could either cover the breasts or leave them exposed, depending on the whim of the designer. Over the next few centuries, however, breasts become strictly private parts. Ancient Athenian women were wearing flowing, multilayered robes that concealed the shape of the bosom by the middle of the first millennium B.C. Spartan attire was more risqué, exposing the female thigh, but breasts were always covered.

But that would be worse?

The solution to women being treated unfairly is not to start treating men unfairly too. It's to treat women fairly.