this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
846 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59680 readers
3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] S_204@lemm.ee 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By unionization..... The stronger the labour force is, the less they are able to get pushed around like this.

[–] anon_water@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well yes. My question is how can we change union busting, because that’s what the article is about.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

By unionizing.

To afford good lawyers in order to fight back, unions need money, which requires more members to pay union dues.

To keep politicians honest and to credibly threaten their electibility, unions need more members that can be politically mobilized.

It's a feedback loop. The more people unionize, the more powerful unions become and the more powerful unions become, the more they can protect people who unionize.

[–] ndguardian@lemmy.studio 34 points 1 year ago

If all the employees are in a union, you can’t get rid of all the unions without getting rid of all the employees.

[–] Krakatoa@lemmy.film 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well we did it once back in the Appalachian mountains.....