this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
145 points (92.9% liked)

Programming

17540 readers
71 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Python is memory safe? Can't you access/address memory with C bindings?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Traister101 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

Yes Rust is harder to write than C, that's basically by design as it's due to the statically guaranteed memory safety. That's pretty magical. C doesn't have that and neither does C++ even with smart pointers and such. Rusts unsafe keyword is poorly named, what it actually does is tell the compiler that you the programmer guarantee Rusts rules are upheld within the unsafe block.

For example

Access or modify a mutable static variable

That is a global, that's incredibly hard to impossible to statically prove it's safely done, so you have to do it in an unsafe block. So you violating Rusts rules within an unsafe block is actually using the unsafe block wrong. That's not what it's for

[–] Fal@yiffit.net -1 points 8 months ago (10 children)

Yes Rust is harder to write than C

I would totally argue with this. Rust is way easier to write than C

[–] Traister101 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd probably say it depends but I'm no Rust expert and I have no direct experience with C (though quite familiar with C++).

Basically I'd expect writing C to be easy, but not safe. IE you can quickly and easily write C that compiles but has runtime issues. Rust for the most part will catch everything but logic issues during/before compilation meaning once the program runs you'll have very high confidence in it's runtime behavior leading to time spent "fighting the compiler" instead of figuring out wtf is going wrong at runtime.

[–] Traister101 2 points 8 months ago

I think primarily I don't really care to argue about if it's harder to write or not since it doesn't really matter. I think the pros Rust provides are worth all it's cons

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)