this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
118 points (87.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43942 readers
637 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Fermi's Paradox. There are so many stars (more than there are grains of sand on earth), that the probablility that one of them has life, and even intelligent life, is >99% . So why haven't we observed it yet? Cue a lot of brilliant people trying to answer that question.

[โ€“] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The Dark Forest - no one wants to alert their presence or attract predators. Though knowing our Earth I think we're stupid enough to do that. Cue the space lasers.

[โ€“] Ashtefere@aussie.zone 3 points 8 months ago

Except those fuckers over here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przybylski%27s_Star who are basically screaming "come at me bro!"

[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Seems like a smart move to stay silent.

It could've also been knowledge interstellar species gained through experience too: if in their first encounters they were either wiped out, or nearly wiped out, then they're not going to reach out again.

[โ€“] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

The dark forest hypothesis is compelling, but I still think the answer is the simpler one: it is the nature of intelligent life to destroy itself

[โ€“] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

The space is

REALLY

Fucking YUUUUUUGE

What you observe of the universe died a really long time ago, it's improbable that other intelligent life in the universe can observe us and the same with us.

We could be multiple galaxies away from each other and never ever know of each other.

[โ€“] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Space is big, light is slow, and the inverse square law is a thing. You think we've been pumping out radio broadcasts for hundreds of years and nobody has contacted us yet, but we're only detectable to life within 200 lightyears if they're specifically looking for the signals we pump out, and they're looking exactly at us. We'll only see a response if they decide to, and we can detect it, and we're looking at them when their response reaches us, and we recognize that it's a response and not a peryton.

It's not a paradox, you just have to look at this Wikipedia page.

[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

You've solved it, congrats!

[โ€“] smackjack@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Could it be that we were the only species that figured out how to communicate via radio?

Not really. The paradox is based on the idea that there are so many stars that even if an infinitesimal portion have intelligent life who have discovered radio, the universe would be much noisier than it is.