this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
1068 points (98.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20829 readers
991 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)
[–] Hubi@feddit.de 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft is the "Linux salesman of the year" because most people switching to Linux do it just because Windows has become so terrible.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Really wish people gave Linux a fair shot instead of considering a $3,000 notebook from Apple. Maybe it's mostly journalist that talk about it every time Microsoft fucks up.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So, as a software engineer who has also used Linux for decades, I get what you’re saying, but the simple fact is that Apple stuff tends to be way more rock-solid reliable for “normal users” (browsing, email, etc - basically, UI- and human-focused tasks) simply because they have vertically integrated everything.

That’s why their stuff “just works” pretty much always for simple activities - because when you control the chip architecture, instruction set, system hardware and integration, OS, the app code, and everything else I forgot to mention, you can do some really cool and hacky things to make the user experience incredible, but that cross some boundaries that a fully black-boxed architecture (that is: a design that strictly followed the hardware specs and didn’t rely on any nonstandard tricks or end-running of normal interfaces) likely wouldn’t.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I get why people do it. I just hate the proposition of throwing out a perfectly good computer that's potentially upgradable and certainly more repairable compared to a Mac.

Ask anyone who had their Mac break and the answer is usually it can't be fixed get a new one. Their hardware feels nice but reducing e-waste is a high priority in my book. MacBooks in particular don't have a great track record for longevity when heavily used, most cheap laptops don't.

An interprise computer designed to be repaired would always be a better option for professionals and individuals alike but even better is one that you already own.

load more comments (6 replies)