this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
287 points (94.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12405 readers
2206 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a Reddit Q&A, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman let slip that he wants the company to be able to generate "NSFW stuff" for users — and he has examples of just what kind of "stuff" he means.

During the exchange, which took place in the r/ChatGPT subreddit over the weekend after OpenAI published its "Model Spec" document outlining its governing rules, another user asked Altman to expound on a curious disclaimer in the document, stipulating that its models "should not serve content" that's NSFW, including "erotica, extreme gore, slurs, and unsolicited profanity."

"We believe developers and users should have the flexibility to use our services as they see fit, so long as they comply with our usage policies," the spec reads. "We're exploring whether we can responsibly provide the ability to generate NSFW content in age-appropriate contexts through the API and ChatGPT. We look forward to better understanding user and societal expectations of model behavior in this area."

Fascinatingly, Altman was dived right in.

"We really want to get to a place where we can enable NSFW stuff (e.g. text erotica, gore) for your personal use in most cases," he wrote, "but not do stuff like make deepfakes."

Unsurprisingly, the comments in that follow-up thread showed Redditors veritably salivating over the concept of OpenAI-produced gore and erotica, with one calling Altman "sam basedman" and another referring to the CEO as the new "king of Reddit."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Been weird seeing the reactions to this news. Suddenly everyone's against porn.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 57 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I want to say that it's just virtue signaling, because I do believe far to many people out there would be all about it behind closed doors. But, there's also a very real possibility that AI generated porn will cross a line very quickly, and it'll be next to impossible to put that genie back in the bottle.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I want AI generated hentai personally. Preferably one where I can feed it my own characters.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Same, look up sillytavern if you want to run a local one for RP.

[–] Matmat07@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

It already exists for pictures. I've tried it first hand. Not from text as such, but from many many possible choices like ethnicity, position, amount of clothing, background, size...

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think its more the VR future for porn that is of more concern than AI.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

That's no future, it's already here in private VR chat worlds and virt-a-mate.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

How do you figure?

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’ve noticed in recent years that we’ve somehow become more puritan in a lot of ways. It’s bizarre to see.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 12 points 6 months ago

The pendulum always swings back.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If there's anyone whose sexual fetish is exploring previously unseen parts of the uncanny valley, they're in for a hell of a good time in the next few years.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"oh boy! the dead eyed women will be such a treat!" /s

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I read this headline and my first thought is that someone will use it to depict a celebrity or politician in a porn or gore (or both) context. That’s my reason for being against it.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I honestly don't care at all if someone's sexting with a Merkel inspired chat bot.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

...why would you put that image im my head

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 6 months ago

The former chancellor of Germany for about 16 years. Might've heard of her?

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If they have such a scenario in their head, they could probably type it out already, without any AI help.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Better they fetishize a celebrity than a person down the street.

It keeps society in better order that way.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between being against porn and being against deepfakes.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Uh huh, and this story is about porn