this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
447 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has waffled on whether the Israel-Gaza war should end. But speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.”

Former president Donald Trump promised to crush pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses, telling a roomful of donors — a group that he joked included “98 percent of my Jewish friends” — that he would expel student demonstrators from the United States, according to participants in the roundtable event with him in New York.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 147 points 6 months ago (4 children)

But let’s protest Biden by abstaining in the general! That’ll teach the Dems a lesson! And get a shit ton more Palestinians murdered but I’ll teach the Dems a lesson that they will definitely forget by 2028!

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 70 points 6 months ago (3 children)

We really need to drive this point home.

Oh, you're not voting for Biden because of his support for Israel? Tell me more about how you care more about teaching dems a lesson than you care about minimizing the Palestinian death toll.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Even if they had the same stance on Israel, which they clearly don’t, let’s not forget the Ukrainians that would lose support on day one of a Trump presidency. Also, China would likely begin to move on Taiwan without US support. He’d set the stage for WWIII and justify it as isolationism.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

US was late to WW1 and WW2. Trump wants to go 3 for 3.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Agree on Ukraine, but China doesn't have the capability to make a move on Taiwan and won't for another decade, if ever. Though Hong Kong and the Uighurs would have an even worse time with Trump in the Whitehouse to be sure.

China's capability of invading Taiwan has been overstated in the media. Sure they have a massive army, but Taiwan is an island and amphibious operations are very very hard to pull off. That being said, Trump probably wouldn't be sending a lot of arms to Taiwan so China invading Taiwan in a decade would be more likely.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

but Taiwan is an island and amphibious operations are very very hard to pull off.

That might hurt them more than anything. All china has to do is blockade Taiwan, obliterate any fishing vessels and ports it sees, and bomb farmland.

A castle can only be defended for as long as it has food stores.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

China can't blockade Taiwan while being outside the range of missiles and drones. China probably has about 400 ships but what is the quality of the air defense and drone boat defense do they have?

They don't have the space to do what Russia is trying (unsuccessfully) in the Black Sea with keeping their ships outside the range of missiles and drones.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That’s a fair assessment of invasion threat. However, if we pull out of the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, they’ll be forced to accept China’s control of import again. That’s devastating to an island nation’s economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Having interacted with these people I can tell you that nothing has any effect on these goalpost moving liars and you just have to step on their dicks and convince bystanders like you do with any worthless bullshitter

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 months ago

There aren't going to be people left by the time Trump takes office. A million people are getting displaced right fucking now. And Biden deserves to be criticized for supporting that. So does Trump, but he's not President right now. Biden is.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The protest vote did send a pretty strong message to dems, but they evidently didn't give a fuck so now we just have to suck it up and vote for biden. It's not that they'll forget the lesson, it's that they never learned it at all. 2016 should have been a lesson as well but we see how that turned out.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

This part really kills me. We already watched it happen once and are now dealing with irreparable damages as a result. How many people protested HRC by either abstaining or voting for a third-party? Fucking nobody wants Hillary in office anymore, but we don't get a say in the ticket so you suck it up and vote for the person who isn't saying they will literally commit all the crimes because being president absolves them of any blame.

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

the democrat party will lose if a segment of their voter base abstains from voting

and

the democrat platform can afford to completely ignore a segment of their voter base so doesn't need to adjust their platform

are two mutually exclusive positions

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (34 children)

Wrong. What the democratic party does is nearly irrelevant.

"We will not vote for Biden because of Gaza" and "We will do what's best for the Palestinians who live in Gaza" are, unfortunately, truly mutually exclusive positions.

It's extremely sad, but that's the position your Republican neighbors have put you in.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Only if you ignore that there’s also a segment of Democratic voters who would reconsider support for Biden if he took a stance that they perceived as anti-Israel. Democrats are a coalition party of compromises between factions who have to work together to find as much common ground as possible in order to have any political relevance in a first-past-the-post system. Biden has to walk whatever tightrope loses the fewest votes, and he seems to think that not doing a 180 on decades of US foreign policy is the best way to do that.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Young dems are so fucking blind to the fact that the majority of Dem voters, the 30-and-ups, support Israel. Biden would LOSE votes from the largest segment of Dem voters for dropping support. He really is caught between a rock and a hard place.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

That’s not what the polling says.

[–] slurpyslop@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

can't withhold a vote because policy won't change because if it did people would withhold their vote and then the policy would change

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It worked when people were mad at Netflix a couple years ago, right?