Linux

48317 readers

685 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

[QUESTION] Flatpak or AUR? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Asudox@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been using arch for a while now and I always used Flatpaks for proprietary software that might do some creepy shit because Flatpaks are supposed to be sandboxed (e.g. Steam). And Flatpaks always worked flawlessly OOTB for me. AUR for things I trust. I've read on the internet how people prefer AUR over Flatpaks. Why? And how do y'all cope with waiting for all the AUR installed packages to rebuild after every update? Alacritty takes ages to build for me. Which is why I only update the AUR installed and built applications every 2 weeks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nonfree software does not have the ability to be rebuilt on each update anyway, since it's distributed as pre-built binaries. So they won't build anyway.

I tend to use AUR packages where possible if the package is not in the official repos. Only if the AUR package is broken do I turn to flatpaks.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Right. So my priority should be like this:

Proprietary: Flatpak

Open Source: Official Repo then AUR

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My priority is: Official repo, AUR then Flatpak.

No matter what license it is. Although, if I need microsoft stuff I usually go flatpak there, so it's sealed off.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Alright, got it. Thanks.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This. Flatpak also provides additional privacy and security features to at least somewhat keep that proprietary garbage under control