I was listening to Liz (Trueanon) explain how they actually got the felony convictions on Trump and, don't quote me on this, but I think the Liberals are going to be very unhappy with the appeals case.

[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The literal 5D legal chess and stack of technicalities required to even express the substance of the prosecution's argument is hilarious and will absolutely never make it through an appeal. Gonna be a fun summer.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lol and the documents trial is basically being delayed indefinitely by his crony judge

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

!.,

[–] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh?

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn't explain it if I wanted to, it's extremely weird.

[–] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Ah. Was this on the pod (could you link)? Are you personal friends with Liz(she can dm me)?

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was some weird technicality that they used to make them felonies. Unless he's convinced of a second crime that he was falsifying business records in furtherance of, the charges should have been misdemeanors.

[–] FungiDebord@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the Noo Yawk case, right? Fani is GA

Oh, I see, that's what Frank was talking about (thought he was talking about Georgia-- yes, that's all my understanding as well)