this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
163 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

1410 readers
596 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Once again, EleutherAI's data frustrates professional content creators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly you should be neither. "Influencers" and other popular characters should not tell you what to do. I am speaking from the perspective of the free software community. FUTO seems to think they can just solve all the problems but the issue is that the create brand new ones. For instance, the ability to fork the code is very important. A license should not restrict a developers ability to fork and make derivative works. A good example of this is Simple Mobile Tools. Simple Mobile tools was bought out by a Iranian ad firm (somehow) and they of course didn't care to maintain the community and were set on making it profitable. It was forked and it is now called Fossify. The F-droid team initial suspended the app from further updates but after the intentions of the new owner became clear they went ahead and replaced it with the fork. This wouldn't of happened under the FUTO source available model. They want you to only get software from the original creator. It feels a whole lot like the business license that is also non free

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Louis Rossmann doesn't tell me what to think. He's just better at saying what I already think. I don't think developers should have to give up control over their projects. I just think the software should be able to be vetted and serviceable. FUTO's way is a good way to manage the funding they're doing, and I suspect they'll likely go libre later in the cycle.

Btw, the sync app is making me have to read vertically this far down the thread. If you wanna reply again, I'd prefer a PM.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I am dragging this out as I am curious how deep it will go.

It is already a tiny column

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Bro. This is the one comment that broke it. 🤪🤪😂🤣🤪😭💀