this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
100 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43464 readers
760 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I make the specification of non-linux because otherwise this would just become a thread full of obscure distros that do the same thing as a million other distros.

Some lesser known OSs:

  • AROS - based on Amiga OS, has some derivatives like IcarOS and MorphOS
  • Haiku - based on BeOS
  • Redox - Unix-like, made in Rust (might technically count as linux?)
  • Serenity - Unix-like, very late 90s look and feel
  • Kolibri - Tiny OS, the image is ~44MB. It also has a smaller version that fits in a single floppy.
  • PhantomOS - When 3 Russians decide to turn everything about a typical OS upside down.
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

There are a few aspects we need to consider...

For the UI, I would go with beOS, Haiku is cool, but the look is a bit too modern, I love the clean look of beOS's UI

For the best compabillity, after a lot of work, ReactOS, a project aiming to create an open source os that is binary compatible with Windows 2000.

[โ€“] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

GEM

Because it's truly outrageous

[โ€“] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll second GEM. The 520ST was my first computer as well.

[โ€“] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

It did a lot with a little!

[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes. My first computer was an Atari 520ST. No hard drive, 520k of ram, and and GEM ran on a dedicated chip.

It's a graphical shell over DOS, but still exists.

[โ€“] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Definitely Haiku, BeOS had a lot of neat ideas in it.

[โ€“] maniii@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I wish Nokia N900 / N950 with Maemo or Meego OS. And full opensource, full MPL or MIT licensed.

I truly wish SailfishOS could be that replacement but I've been burnt too many times already.

[โ€“] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

L4! Imagine all we could do if the kernel was tiny and everything was user space.

[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Had a quick read about it, looks like an interesting skeleton to base an end user OS.

[โ€“] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

seL4

A formally verified microkernel

[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 4 months ago
[โ€“] JohnBon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] JohnBon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honnest question: why is it Linux? I can't find relevant information on the matter. Every source point the fact that it's a bare metal hypervisor therefore not Linux but that's all. Could you enlighten me on the matter? Thanks in advance.

[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was my first impression after a quick glance at it, since it listed Fedora, Debian and several other linux "flavors", plus wikipedia lists it as "OS Family: Linux".

Looking and paying proper attention, I see that it doesn't actually use the linux kernel, the OS just starts VMs for whatever applications you need. The dom0, the "main virtualized OS" and basically the bare minimum the user will interact with, runs Fedora, which is linux.

I see why I'd still call it linux, even if it's "not really" linux due to the kernel (Xen hypervisor) being something completely different, because all the user interaction goes through Fedora.

[โ€“] JohnBon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the explanation, I understand now your point of view. It sums up on which layer we consider then. BTW qubes is a fantastic OS if you want isolation of information or privacy. One VM could serve for work, another for browsing, and eventually for privacy. Take care !

[โ€“] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

Maybe minix? Because microkernel.

[โ€“] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Here's the link for Redox OS btw: https://www.redox-os.org/

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev -3 points 4 months ago

Honestly, if I had this magic power, I'd pick something like Ubuntu or Fedora. The exact pick doesn't matter, I don't want this to devolve into a holy war, but I want to "The Year of the Linux Desktop" to stop being a tongue in cheek meme. I want Windows and Apple to have to make meaningful changes to maintain their market share.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ