this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
495 points (95.7% liked)

Firefox

17957 readers
142 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll is over, and the result is clear:

#FireFox users have very little interest for Chatbot integration into their browser.

I am very much aware that the people, who voted in this poll are hardly a representative sample, but more than 2.4K people is a better size than many "professional" opinion polls.

@mozilla & @firefox should take people, who actually care about their #browser choice, seriously.

I still seriously believe that #Mozilla's fate matters,

https://berlin.social/@mina/113102817500429735

1/3

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jangdonggun@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Can this poll be considered official ? I clicked the link and it looks like a Twitter poll or something.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I used to always have a ChatGPT tab pinned, so I wouldn't mind. That said, the integration is just plain terrible. To be more precise, the whole experience with the sidebar is terrible. Why can I only have one and not even choose the default one? I need two clicks to get to the assistant, which is one more than just pinning a tab...

In Brave, the integration is so much better. They have a dedicated button (that you can also disable iirc), that opens a sidebar with only the chatbot. Moreover, you can choose from a bunch of models or link your own. You are not constantly at risk of accidentally sending something to it when selecting text, because neither is "AI" the top option in context menus, nor is one opening automatically. AI doesn't appear in search. And it can even do more (e.g. "summarize this entire page"), while there is also no need to log in.

In short: This seems not thought through at all. And if it was, maybe the reactions would be less negative.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›