this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
108 points (99.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6480 readers
413 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Three grams of explosive on a custom board, that they can detonate at will.

Kinda terrifying actually.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I feel like this should unironically be a war crime. The potential for collateral is ridiculously high.

Edit: I'm amazed at how successfully this is being spun as a highly-targeted, high-precision attack with no collateral when it's pretty much the opposite. You can't control what they do with the pagers after they get them. Ffs there were kids killed.

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine if one of those pagers had been on a plane...

[–] fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

An ounce of high explosive won't take down a plane. Even at cruising altitude.

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno, did you see the picture of what happened to the pager that was on the table? I could see that going through a few mm of aluminium.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would someone be holding their pager against the wall of a plane?

[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're sitting in a window seat your pocket is pretty much against the hull.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a horrifying thought. You are a gonner at that point

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

If the pilots each had one and they were sitting on the flight console when boom boom

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

It may not take it down but it would likely not end well. Also an ounce of certain explosives is a lot more destructive than others.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago

I saw a post earlier on my mastodon mentioning this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Mines,_Booby-Traps_and_Other_Devices I do see "portable objects" mentioned, but given that the section is otherwise about stuff associated with children, I'm not sure if pagers would qualify or not.

[–] Krono 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a wild new form of terrorist attack.

I can't think of any other time consumer goods were sabotaged in a mass fatality attack like this.

Now I'm just a tiny bit afraid my phone is about to explode in my face.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Drop it in a bucket of water. Source: I've seen many films

[–] AmbiguousProps 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Quite the supply chain attack.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If what's described in the story is accurate, this is incredibly impressive work.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Username checks out

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

It's not. Taiwanese say that pagers weren't made by them but instead these were made by their Hungarian subsidiary, but that company only has nameplate at residential address. It seems that shipment was for 5000 pagers and extra faje component was added

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Fucking nuts.

Mass detonation at the exact same time is spooky deus ex shit.

Can hear Adam Jenson narrating this news crawl

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i've seen other source stating that it was something between 30 and 60g

give it a few days, nobody knows what is going on and only thing you can get are rumors. some people still think it was lithium battery

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I read an article saying one type of the pagers that blew up was an Apollo AP-900, which uses triple A alkaline batteries, so there's no way a battery overload could have caused that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pagers aren't particularly big or heavy, I think it would be hard to hide that much explosive in one.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

30-60g is a very very noticeable amount

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

You can buy cellphones that weigh less than 80g, someone would notice.

[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't think too much about that used laptop you got for cheap and haven't opened up.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

There was a journalist who had an attack on there life via a explosive USB drive. Luckily they plugged it into a hub first which only caused part of it to go off not the entire thing

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 9 points 1 week ago

That seems pretty credible to me.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago

Sources is allways trustworthy.