Tucker Carlson? You mean the guy who is funded by Russia? https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/story/justin-trudeau-tucker-calrson-russian-propaganda
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Killing is the point of land mines? Wow, Tucker must be a genius.
If the Russians stay in Russia, they'll be at no risk.
"Killing is the point" yeah thats what happens in war.
Russians can easily avoid getting blown up by them just by staying in their country.
And Ukrainian children can easily avoid getting blown up by them by just staying indoors
I dont the rhe Russian soldiers themselves can. But their superiors certainly can
Fragging is an option.
On the one hand, Carlson being against it makes me assume that it's probably a good thing, but on the other I'm usually pretty against the use of landmines because they have a strong tendency to sit around for a long time and maim random civilians.
But if he said the sky was blue I'd have to go check for myself.
The landmines that Biden approved are battery powered. While they are still indiscriminate killing machines, they will self-neutralize rather than remain dangerous for decades to come.
This. U do still have to worry about what the error rate is considering the vast number that will be deployed.
Yup.
I think Biden is wrong for the reasons you lay out. It won't just be the Russians that suffer from mining.
WWII ordinances still get pulled up pretty regularly in France.
Yeah, sure, because the technology is exactly the same now as it was 80 years ago.
World War II ordinances didn't rely on batteries and so remain(ed) dangerous for far longer.
These are still explosive. While the triggering mechanism may go bad after the battery dies, are the explosive chemicals neutralized? What happens on a shock to the device? For example, if it's crushed by a vehicle or hit by a plow blade?
I can grant that these are probably safer than yesteryear's model, but I also think you are still setting up bobbytraps that are potentially dangerous for decades.
Do some research and get back to us.
Most explosives are chemically and physically stable like c4. Driving over them isn't going to set them off, nor is hitting them with any kind of blunt force.
Hell, you can even burn C4 and it does not explode.
Interesting concept for a BBQ - C4 instead of charcoal.
,
I mean they're being invaded, and by Russia out of all countries. Just like their use of cluster ammunition, they probably decided it's worth the risk.
Well, some of them did. Conscription is active in Ukraine which means there’s a lot of people involved against their will.
There is a simple solution - Tucker's pal Putin could GTFO of Ukraine. How about that?
Don't step on Ukrainian land if you don't want to deal with Ukrainian land mines?
Good thing land mines can distinguish between Ukrainians and Russians I guess?
They have an expiration date. Not purly for lobg term safety reasons but it also allows for more advanced tactical use cases.
Do they have fixed expiry after which the thing is inert, or just a battery that runs down after which a different energy source (or shock to the battery) is needed to trigger them?
They have en expiry after which they explode i believe.
And a child years after the war ends.
Landmines were internationally banned for a reason.
Iirc, these have an expiration date
Not that it fully absolves them, but better than the ones that go boom 30 years after the fact
Come on and SLAM
If you wanna JAM
Tucker Carlson throws Biden off of hell in the cell and 16 feet into the announcer table for supplying land mines.
slams
So fucking tired of this headline eye-grabber.
Oh no he didn't!
Um? Yea...