this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
933 points (95.8% liked)

pics

23823 readers
241 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess some people thought it was AI, but just a cool moment in my basement window well.

Edit: taken with my iPhone several years ago since that’s all I had with me when it happened so quickly.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago

I won, but at what cost? My fellow cones perished.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Quest item.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thomas Kinkade's pinecone.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Lol when I first saw iPhone my brain read it as the default signature iPhones put in emails.

Sent from my iPhone.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Welcome home then.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

serves you right for posting something so lewd.

stupid sexy pinecones...

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got banned because I told everybody who was mocking that retarded weather guy to stop mocking him.

load more comments (2 replies)

I don't see how they could have mistaken this for AI. It just doesn't have the vibe, there's too much roughness and it's not just totally overloaded with details.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›