He was VP. His espoused policy was effectively supporting Harris'. If you look at his record in MN and actually listen to his statements, his native policy positions become pretty clear. I don't know when your day was, but people have been as politically illiterate as you since the fucking oongaboonga times.
FatCrab
joined 2 years ago
No, i think I'm primarily going to blame the people who voted for Trump for Trump being elected.
Pretty active and critical of the administrations actions. People just don't read anything but headlines and then only actually integrate into memory the negative ones conforming to their preferred world view.
If conservatives don't want to get shit on, they should stop being a fucking sewer.
We do, but democrats have not had effective comprehensive power to overcome typical republican bullshittery in decades.
Yes, he is a piece of shit who deserves an invite to the mario party along with the rest of them.
Or is thrown a livestreamed surprise Mario party.
Seconding the other guy's endorsement of the zflip. I got mine as a really cheap trade in upgrade thinking the folding was just a gimmick and now I'm pretty much always advocating for the thing. Hasn't been any less durable than any other phone I've had and though there's a very minor crease mostly from the protective panel, it's never been an issue.
President Dickhead Dory
It could of course go up to the scotus and effectively a new right be legislated from the bench, but it is unlikely and the nature of these models in combination with what is considered a copy under the rubric copyright in the US has operated effectively forever means that merely training and deploying a model is almost certainly not copyright infringement. This is pretty common consensus among IP attorneys.
That said, a lot of other very obvious infringement in coming out in discovery in many of these cases. Like torrenting all the training data. THAT is absolutely an infringement but is effectively unrelated to the question of whether lawfully accessed content being used as training data retroactively makes its access unlawful (it really almost certainly doesn't).
Does lithium mining inherently push GHG into the atmosphere? I'm honestly asking because I don't know much about the process other than it requires significant amounts of processing to extract lithium from its surrounding deposits. But if the source of emissions for lithium mining are solely from powering the equipment, it is not really a climate change issue (though even localized environmental damage is bad and needs to be addressed, of course).
Ummm....that article says there was still a drastic methane cut, it was just ~20% after accounting for the longer life of the cattle due to unpredicted slower mass gain with the supplement. They had hoped for no changes to development of the cattle and around 80% or higher emissions cut. Article also makes it clear there were a lot of confounders in how they measured methane in the trial so this is realistically a great starting point and a strong show of the value proposition. Moreover, seaweed is good for water ecosystems so cultivating it at scale would be another value add. I don't eat farmed meat, but I don't expect that to ever be standard across the human species and this is certainly a strong improvement. You don't seem to understand what greenwashing is.