FunnyUsername

joined 1 year ago
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay, you got me! Hi-fi Rush is a masterpiece of perfection, the others that upvoted my OP are definitely wrong too, and any criticism ever considered by a player is just incorrect, because a lot of people loved it, and things a lot of people love are always perfect.

So sorry for the confusion! Have a good weekend!

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Just because things are highly beloved does not mean they aren't flawed and couldn't use improvements. Starfield has an 83 on metacritic. Life is Strange an 85. As of right now, only 190 people are playing Hi Fi Rush on Steam. 204 are currently playing Bayonetta, for comparison. I never said the game was a trainwreck or totally unenjoyable, i said i believed it could have been even better if they paid attention to criticisms that put off the people who didn't enjoy it.

Edit: also just looking at the percentages on the global steam achievements and most people do not even see the ending for a 9 hour game. The achievement for beating it on normal difficulty is ......16%.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I'm glad you liked it, but the two camps are definitely "this game is a masterpiece" and "this game combat is overbloated and feels sloppy". Just check the negative steam reviews, they eco similar sentiments to each other

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ya!!! The prequel to nier ❤️

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

This game was only good for 4-5 hours, imo. Hi-fi rush was a refreshing concept that attracted attention because it stood out in a sea of similar looking titles that the mainstream has become. But they didn't follow through on the player feedback for such a creative leap in gameplay. It really shows when they start piling on new gameplay mechanics, and combat stops being fun and becomes a mess of awkward controls and spazzy cameras and frustrating vertically-aligned jumping.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No idea why you got downvoted for being so right, the guy makes schlock

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Drakengard comes to mind

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you pretty consumercentric, or do you have some niche interests as well? Google is great at basic tasks and delivering product results and promoted content, and if that's what you're usually looking for it probably works great for you. People have trouble these days trying to find the specific stuff. Google used to really excel at this in the past, but now it's buried under pages of promoted content or pages SEO gamed to the top but not being very helpful

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He died in hs. I was in college. It was years later. Thanks for saying I'm basically retarded or a straight up terrible human because of a short post on the internet about Facebook.

You are the reason i left Facebook. I'll just block you here on lemmy.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't like online games and a big part of the reason why is 3 of these options

10
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by FunnyUsername@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world
 

What do you guys think about Walmart+? Service has good value, or just another way a company can suck more money out of consumers while providing the bare minimum of service and quality?

Edit: lemmy squashed my image into a potato, so here's a hosted one: https://pasteboard.co/ybPFckqHErr2.jpg

 
 

Tammy likes bags.

view more: next ›