Weird take, but you do you, boo.
Rivalarrival
joined 1 year ago
You have no idea what sets off someone deranged enough to go on a killing spree.
I'm kinda curious if you have access to rifles and/or clock towers..
Taylor Swift endorsed Harris with a photo of her dinner.
I've been making cat jokes. Taylor Swift's endorsement of Harris was accompanied by a photo of her with her dinner.
I fundamentally disagree with OP on this. Ignore it, and the Republicans become the only ones talking about it. They aren't saying it's bullshit. We can't control the message without talking about it; the best way to defuse it is to use it to attack dementia don and the Couchfucker in Chief.
This wasn't "negligence" or "accidental". He was deliberately pointing the gun at the individual. It wasn't unintentionally pointed at him. It wasn't accidentally pointed at him. The bullet didn't unexpectedly ricochet off of something to hit the teen. He deliberately chose to point a gun at another person. That deliberate handling of the gun eliminates the possibility of "negligence".
I don't quite know how you didn't, but you managed to piss off both gun owners and hoplophobes with that comment, and those groups can't seem to agree on anything else.
That factoid makes celsius relevant for about 4 out of the 12 months, and humans lack the capacity to distinguish between 60-100 on the Celsius scale. Anything at those temperatures just feels like blisters.
Yep!
Personally, I'm deprecating "its".
The "its/it's" distinction requires violation of the apostrophe-s rule for possessive forms. This exception to that rule is entirely arbitrary. The meaning is never ambiguous in context; the distinction exists solely to enable pedantry and confuse spell checkers.
So, English will be better off by retiring "its", relegating it to the trash heap along with "chuse".
"It's" is now a homonym. Both the contraction rules and the possessive rules for apostrophe-s construction are maintained, and the only people who will cry about it are English teachers and other worthless pedants.
I have spoken.
"do something, anything as long as it ~~doesn't affect me~~ actually targets the oil industry.
FTFY.
People freak out when travel is disturbed. They freak out quite a bit less when a big corporation that everyone hates happens to get targeted by environmental activists.
They would raise more awareness and facilitate more productive discussion and alienate fewer people and have a tangible, measurable effect by taking direct action against car dealership and gas stations.
The kind of "discussion" they have most "facilitated" is how to increase the penalties for impeding traffic. Their only "success" has been winning enough support for legislators to increase penalties and enforcement for "impeding traffic"
Never seen a two-stroke mower...