Sounds like you have an idea of what it means to you and are trying to foist that upon others.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Senal
joined 2 years ago
I don't exactly disagree, but i think my stance is that the money is the reason and the morals/ethics are a byproduct of having to do what it takes to get that money, in certain markets.
Sure, enough pressure from the ad execs would bring about change, probably.
I just wanted to point out that they aren't working with a moral or ethical baseline, only money.
I think they will care about complaints of convicted human traffickers.
I would lay money on them not giving a single solitary fuck unless it affects their bottom line somehow.
Is that screenshot purposely taken to make him look like henry cavill ?
or am i imagining it ?
that's a dictionary definition , top tier cherry picking though, congrats.
Spotify paid ridiculous sums of money, specifically to get Joe Rogan.
They absolutely do not care about complaints about tate.
Not to say you shouldn't try, you should, just that it's screaming into the void until the monetary price of continuing support is greater than at least some combination of sunk cost + potential profit. ( so $250m + whatever their profit projections are ).
The differences here are that ORM and web frameworks weren't actively making the job harder and the sheer surface area of the problem.
If you fuck up with a framework or an ORM, it generally just fails to work, the magic internals might not be super helpful with their error messages, but such is the nature of the tradeoffs.
If you fuck up with an LLM you get something that generally compiles and looks like it should work, that's much more of a problem for both you and anyone who then needs to go trawling through, looking for the issues.
Are actions gold now, last i looked they were still a bit shonky?
Plex is a solid meh/10 back end wise, provided you have the knowledge to run the docker container it's not that bad.
Running it standalone is potentially effort.
My main issue with plex is it's transition into enshittification as a service.
i wasn't the person who replied to your first post.
The sentiment might have been somewhat clear, but the language indicated a misunderstanding of how much reliance there is upon society, which is what was called out (again, not by me).
You asked a question, i answered with my opinion also i look fabulous in my pointdexter pants, i even have the matching pocket protector.
In fairness is was full jank on release, the initial patches got it to "bethesda jank" where it was fun with the bugs (provided you could actually play it) but still bug ridden.
It got better over time, until just before the "big patch" came in that fully changed how it all worked skills and mechanics wise (gameplay was mostly the same).
Honestly i prefer, pre-"big patch" but the fully patched game is considerably smoother and more coherent.
So, aside from the years of post release development, completely missing features that are never actually coming (looking at you full transit system), it's actually pretty good.
An absolutely dogshit way of releasing a game, but if you waited for a few years and bought it on discount , it's actually a really fun game (provided you like that sort of thing).
TBC I'm not justifying anything about this process , it was a major fuckup and many other dev houses would have gone under from the weight of how badly they fucked it up, but they had that witcher money, so.