experbia

joined 2 years ago
[–] experbia@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I would mostly imagine due to fear of retributive terrorist attack.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Developers were right to be in fear of Baldur's Gate 3 resetting expectations. This isn't close to all of the reason for this backlash, but for me it's a notable part.

Here we all have for contrast suddenly an expansive, complete, player-respecting game that isn't trying to squeeze money out of you at every turn... it reminds me of old PC games, before the enshittification of the industry began, before the corporate rot set in. When I bought my copy of Heroes of Might and Magic 3, it was complete. It was expansive. It was before micro-transactions were really a thing, so it was a finished product. BG3 makes me think of those games, but with modern technology. My gaze shifts back to the allegedly "modern" games we have now, to Overwatch 2, and it just feels cheap and disgusting. A minimum-viable pile of gameified gambling covered in greasy MBA penny-pincher fingerprints, shrouded by half-truths from marketers trying to puff it up to look like a complete experience. It is still possible to deliver the better experience. It's clearly just a matter of "want".

I feel like I've just come from a family-owned restaurant on the beach in Cabo and came back home to a McDonald's in a roadside casino, and I've just realized how genuinely shitty it all is.

I think I would actually rather just go outside or start a new hobby than touch "games" like this ever again.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

And it would never have gotten completely out of control, if people didn’t use ad-block.

"I wouldn't get so carried away beating you if you didn't make me so much angrier by trying to run when I smack you."

We should never have tried to fund the web with ads in the first place.

I agree. But here we are. And until it's illegal to do so (and, honestly, afterwards too), when a website I'm viewing politely asks me to download toxic ad content filled with psychological manipulation and malware, my computer will politely whisper "no." I might revisit this policy in the future if the entire advertising industry takes a huge step back to tone down their abusive shit, but in the meanwhile, I have no problem blocking malignant content from my presence. No means no.

A business plan that requires psychological abuse and exploitation of your customers is not an ethical, sustainable, or valid plan and the people who push it are not worthy of my consideration.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Wells Fargo are simply criminal, it has been demonstrated again and again. It would not surprise me in the slightest if I were to learn that this was an intentional test to see how many people would notice a missing deposit or two and gauge how often they can simply swipe some deposits "accidentally".

[–] experbia@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Like, what is wrong with reading something? Is it really that hard?

Half of US adults cannot read a book written at an 8th grade level.
Video is easier and faster for most people, as much as I dislike it. It's a way for a clueless board of MBAs to circumvent the "literacy" problem of more widespread adoption of their service. Lowest-common-denominator corner-shaving ruins everything, as usual.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I live in Oregon. These people are a total joke around here. It's just funny as hell to think that Idaho would want them - their whole counties are net liabilities in the state economy. Yet they stomp around "threatening" to run away from home and go to Idaho like a teenager mad over having to go to summer school. Might want to actually check with Idaho first, idiots.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 31 points 2 years ago

Of course they are. Citizens can be conscripted.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Firstly, they’re classifying the term “grooming” as hate speech. That’s not factual.

I couldn't agree more, I'm glad you said this. See, I personally think all conservatives (presumably such as yourself, but if you're not, you're obviously close enough) are pedophilic sexual predators by nature, which is why they so readily jump to the false conclusion that everyone wants to fuck kids all the time. Normally I wouldn't say this because when I've said so in the past, conservatives have been real mad about it and viewed it as hateful to be associated with something so repulsive merely by way of having a certain political identity, but it's nice to be in a safe space you've created that allows for me to share this decidedly non-hateful speech targeted at conservatives (and you!) that expresses my complete and utter contempt for you and your gross, clearly unsafe way with children. I mean, you willingly force them into churches (a.k.a 'rape factories') all the time. Tells you all you need to know about any conservative. You're obviously complicit.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 46 points 2 years ago

do I have a case against either my institution, the professor who threw it out or OpenAI?

This all seems like such recent technology, I can not imagine this question being very answerable except via the long way: a courtroom. I suspect it would take someone trying in order to set precedent.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just being able to tinker is kind of like my stim.

100% agreed. My main computer is a beast of a Linux system that is in a state of continual improvement. If I'm stressed, I just make little fixes here and there.. try new things, create new little tools. It's extremely relaxing to have something to dump one's tinker energy into!

[–] experbia@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

I want to take a moment to wish you luck! I've always believed anyone can program, even if not everyone can program everything. Modern web development can be very profitable, but very overwhelming. It is a constantly-shifting landscape of new standards and practices and tools. It has rebuffed many people due to this, who often become dejected by its complexity and dynamism.

If this is not you, then that's excellent! However, if you feel this way, you should know that a different, slower, more stable version of web development still exists, which more closely mirrors conventional software development and even the shell scripting you have experience with: older style monolithic web applications are everywhere, and more continue to appear. Written in PHP, C#, ASP, even Perl (old!), these older web applications tend to have fairly stable ecosystems and documentation. You rarely find the biggest industry names like Microsoft and Apple and Netflix touting its engineers as having expert level knowledge in these languages and ecosystems, because they're seen as somewhat old-hat, but they have a massive industry presence nonetheless... and fewer and fewer competent programmers exist to maintain and improve these systems.

Facebook is still largely comprised of PHP code, I believe - though they use a different runtime. WordPress is still a staggeringly massive presence on the Internet for anything from business sites to e-commerce shops, and it has a huge (and profitable, if you find a niche!) ecosystem of plug-ins written in PHP and Javascript/CSS/HTML. The new fediverse software (kbin) I am writing this post on is written in PHP! It is still easily possible to make a comfortable living doing nothing but quality PHP, especially if you can find a nice niche. It has a (relatively) undeserved bad reputation amongst modern programmers.

Anyway, thought to mention this. Good luck!

[–] experbia@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any tool for productivity improvement is seen by leadership as a way to heap more work onto each individual worker. More work per worker means more profit per hour the worker is paid.

Our economic reality is diametrically opposed to this concept people seem to naively hold of "automation making things easier", or somehow needing to work less for the same money because "computers are doing it". No, that benefit does not ever visit the worker, it goes right to the owners.

view more: ‹ prev next ›