111
Climate change fueled wildfires cause home and rental insurance rates to surge; State Farm solvency in question.
There! Fixed the headline. Journalism is so hard!
It is very obviously satire of the fat acceptance movement.
They just inverted the genders and kept the rest of the analogy and lingo as similar as possible.
Pack 100 of compsognathus (compsognathii?) says hello.
Not sure how out of date the research is, but in the original Jurassic Park book, there are roaming packs of these things that overwhelm and kill people.
Though the on screen scene of them killing people happens in the second movie, it actually takes place in the first book IIRC... anyway, they're basically depicted as land piranhas.
(Again, IIRC, Jurassic Park the book basically gets set in motion with a family of tourists being eviscerated by a pack of compys... but the first movie dropped this from the story, then when the second movie comes out they basically use this scene as the intro for that, but its on a different island and used to set off an entirely new story?)
Do you have a confession to make?
The explanation I've seen is that ... is notation for something that can be otherwise represented as sums of infinite series.
In the case of 0.999..., it can be shown to converge toward 1 with the convergence rule for geometric series.
If |r| < 1, then:
ar + ar² + ar³ + ... = ar / (1 - r)
Thus:
0.999... = 9(1/10) + 9(1/10)² + 9(1/10)³ + ...
= 9(1/10) / (1 - 1/10)
= (9/10) / (9/10)
= 1
Just for fun, let's try 0.424242...
0.424242... = 42(1/100) + 42(1/100)² + 42(1/100)³
= 42(1/100) / (1 - 1/100)
= (42/100) / (99/100)
= 42/99
= 0.424242...
So there you go, nothing gained from that other than seeing that 0.999... is distinct from other known patterns of repeating numbers after the decimal point.
I used to have a Prius C, got it used.
95% of shops wouldn't touch it for anything non cosmetic. Hybrid, confusing, scary!
Learned how to work on it myself, before it got stolen.
Guess I just got the beta version of not being able to have your car serviced, due to good old fashioned blue collar laziness and incompetence.
Jesus fucking god.
Anderson Cooper is talking to Kamala.
After Kamala basically explains some actual achievements of the Biden administration while refusing to address Biden's incoherence...
Cooper says "Yes but neither candidate explained what you just said so succinctly and quickly."
This is after Kamala has been stalling for almost an hour. When she comes in screen she's twirling her hair nervously and does it again, unable to even crack her immensely fake smile a single time.
MSNBC and CNN basically are either in shock or reporting on the entire Democratic party being in shock.
With MSNBC, after most of the panel talks about the possibility of Biden resigning Maddow just got into an argument with some other talking head over whether or not its possible for Biden to bow out, as the other person says yeah it actually is technically possible.
To sum up, Cooper asked Kamala if Joe is like this all the time.
She did not say no.
What an astounding fuck up.
I think it was his third time speaking... he was answering one question on one topic and basically accidentally started talking about something else and then was visibly confused as he realized he was making no sense.
I am legitimately going to need to read a transcript of this to figure out wtf he was talking about half the time.
Like... Biden was just asked if his age would impact his presidency.
His response was to mumble about being the youngest person in politics originally, and uh we are building more chip fab plants, and America is awesome.
Trump is now answering the same question and is actually staying on topic for his entire answer though he's lying a bit.
And Joe just went back to mumbling about how Trump is actually 6 foot 4, or 6 foot 5, or well anyway he couldnt carry his bag while golfing.
Yeah... Biden is very much coming across as a near senile grandpa and Trump is coming across far more well composed.
Yeah, its infuriating that punk has become a suffix.
There is nothing punk about steampunk, dieselpunk, atompunk. They are just fantasy technological scenarios / art styles.
Cyberpunk has an both a recognizable aesthetic and a whole lot of political, social and philosophical views baked into it. You get the punks in cyberpunk as either a direct ideological opposition to the power of corporations, or as an indirect result of said corpos creating a hell world for 99% of people.
There is nothing inherently rebellious about worlds or characters within worlds with more prevalent / advanced steam or diesel or nuclear power.
Solarpunk arguably has some actual punk to it if you actually try to follow the idea of personally minimizing your fossil fuel usage, but mostly its a utopian or post-dystopian setting / art style.
Its now like -gate being affixed to any kind of publicized controversy.
Most people do not understand what Watergate even was and why it was so significant.
Yep, thats my impression as well so far.
Trump is confidently blazing through (what should be) obvious lies, while Biden is mumbling and forgetting what he is trying to say half way through saying it.
Currently we are about 10 minutes into the debate.
Trump is confidently stating lie after lie after lie, basically the condensed version of his recent speeches main lies.
Biden on the other hand is saying things that are far closer to true, but he is mumbling and has already trailed off and forgot what he was talking about.
We are doomed.
view more: next ›
sp3tr4l
joined 2 months ago
Ok. In mathematical notation/context, it is more specific, as I outlined.
Ok. Never said 0.999... is not a real number. Yep, it is exactly 1 because solving the equation it truly represents, a geometric series, results in 1. This solution is obtained using what is called the convergence theorem or rule, as I outlined.
0.424242... solved via the convergence theorem simply results in itself, as represented in mathematical nomenclature.
0.999... does not again result in 0.999..., but results to 1, a notably different representation that causes the entire discussion in this thread.
I meant what I said: "know patterns of repeating numbers after the decimal point."
Perhaps I should have also clarified known finite patterns to further emphasize the difference between rational and irrational numbers.