yarr

joined 1 year ago
[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

proper nouns like sed, awk and grep?

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reddit comment threads are currently just full of groupmind wankery. I like being on a platform where I don't 100% agree with everyone and I don't have to hold "sanctioned" opinions that are approved by a mod team of 3.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Totally, but at least Oracle doesn't pretend they are some kind of beacon of open source. Red Hat is trying to party like it's 1999 while it's just a boring division of IBM now.

 

RANT AHEAD:

Quite a few times now, I've seen the complaint that "the news refuses to cover the story about the migrants' sinking ship and focuses on the billionaires instead".

This strikes me as totally unsurprising. 99% of all news sites are given by gathering clicks and eyeballs. The Titan story has it all:

  • Billionaires
  • Zany CEO with submarine with oddly sourced parts
  • Tie in to one of the most famous shipwrecks of all time
  • A story that's technically easy to understand (the sub went underwater and was lost, you don't need a degree in advanced physics to appreciate this)
  • Some drama because they might have been underwater without oxygen vs. instantly dead due to decompression
  • The possibility of an exciting sea rescue

vs the migrants' story

  • No one famous or of note on board
  • This is by far NOT the first vessel lost in this manner
  • No exciting twists

I'm sorry, but if I headed up a news room OF COURSE you will run the first story. It's simply more exciting. This is NOT an example of class war or a personal vendetta against the poor.

If you are one of those who think the migrants story should be more closely followed why don't YOU lead a discussion about it, volunteer your money and/or time to organizations that support migrants, etc.

It's also a really boring complaint to see, because nearly ALL of the major news outlets DID cover the story, but guess what, it is far less engaging, so it gets less attention overall.

Don't blame the news for what stories get big -- blame the public and their fascination with these stories. The news outlets are only putting out what their audience wants to see.

Feel free to start a site that talks only about migration issues, but I think you'll find it way harder to make money vs talking about clickbait.

 

RANT AHEAD:

Quite a few times now, I've seen the complaint that "the news refuses to cover the story about the migrants' sinking ship and focuses on the billionaires instead".

This strikes me as totally unsurprising. 99% of all news sites are given by gathering clicks and eyeballs. The Titan story has it all:

  • Billionaires
  • Zany CEO with submarine with oddly sourced parts
  • Tie in to one of the most famous shipwrecks of all time
  • A story that's technically easy to understand (the sub went underwater and was lost, you don't need a degree in advanced physics to appreciate this)
  • Some drama because they might have been underwater without oxygen vs. instantly dead due to decompression
  • The possibility of an exciting sea rescue

vs the migrants' story

  • No one famous or of note on board
  • This is by far NOT the first vessel lost in this manner
  • No exciting twists

I'm sorry, but if I headed up a news room OF COURSE you will run the first story. It's simply more exciting. This is NOT an example of class war or a personal vendetta against the poor.

If you are one of those who think the migrants story should be more closely followed why don't YOU lead a discussion about it, volunteer your money and/or time to organizations that support migrants, etc.

It's also a really boring complaint to see, because nearly ALL of the major news outlets DID cover the story, but guess what, it is far less engaging, so it gets less attention overall.

Don't blame the news for what stories get big -- blame the public and their fascination with these stories. The news outlets are only putting out what their audience wants to see.

Feel free to start a site that talks only about migration issues, but I think you'll find it way harder to make money vs talking about clickbait.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am. It’s there in the GPL text in black and white. Red Hat does not have any right to place restrictions on the distribution of derivative works that they do not own the original copyright for. Threatening to terminate a service agreement is a restriction.

From what I understand, these restrictions only apply to if you have been provided the software. Red Hat is under no legal obligation to supply you with their software, nor to continue doing so if you violate their terms.

I agree this makes them total scumbags, but as far as I understand the GPL they are not breaking the law.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The new model is "fuck you, pay me"

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing a fork or two won't solve.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Canonical has their own problems right now... Not a lot of snap fans out there. Canonical seems determined to skate to somewhere their users don't live and create a world they don't want.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Red Hat died the day IBM bought them. All that garbage about "leaving Red Hat alone" was of course total nonsense. IBM is doing what it does best -- squeeze its existing customer base for short term gains. This won't be the last thing Red Hat does that makes people annoyed.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Well hell man, give us the details.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nix and Common Lisp seem to sit in the same space -- it's spoken of extremely fondly but has difficulty escaping the lab. For some reason it's extremely technically capable, but fails to find widespread adoption.

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So you stop and then it goes unchecked.

But de-federating ENSURES it goes unchecked....

[–] yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Certainly, if it's baseless propaganda you'll have no trouble rebutting all the points instead of attacking the source.

 

An ironic observation - I've been understanding Reddit better here on Lemmy than while actually on Reddit. It's fascinating how this platform, while being an alternative, can offer such deep insights about another.

Has anyone else experienced this paradox? Would love to hear your thoughts.

view more: next ›