Public Health

375 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

It may be difficult or impossible to control food quality well enough that every container be mealworm-free. But I expect metrics to be kept so someone can monitor whether or not a supply chain is doing something notably reckless.

Delhaize historyDelhaize started off as a food producer who was regarded as a brand of high quality products. Then they became a big grocery store chain. So of course they sell their own products. And in fact I have never seen Delhaize products sold by other stores.

.
When I tried to return the rooibos, the CSR asked for a receipt. I did not have one, so he refused. I said: look, it’s brand of the store, so of course it came from here. He argued that it may not have come from /this/ precise store.

I don’t give a shit about getting a 2 euro refund. My whole point was to get the incident recorded so they can look into QA issues. So then I reported this to the food safety authority in Belgium. It’s possible they acted on it, but they sent no acknowledgement. Which effectively signals to consumers they are wasting their time by reporting quality issues.

Is this all normal? I would expect a public health agency to be keen to encourage reports of worms packaged in food.

I think the norm is (sadly enough) to use Twitter. Someone tweets “worm in my food” with a good photo, it gets some attention, then the supplier is forced to try to remedy their embarrassment. This hack doesn’t work for non-Twitter non-Facebook users.

(edit) attached a pic

2
 
 

This creepy crawly was found living in a rarely used toilet in Brussels.

I was alarmed to find it. Is it a parasite? Hookworm, or roundworm?

Some history:

This is a rarely used part of the house. One day I discovered the toilet bowl was teeming with sewer drain fly larvae. Also creeped me out until I worked out what I was looking at. I’m not bothered about drain flies so I just left it alone. Returned to the toilet a couple months later and the trap was bone-dry. There was a hard blob of something.. mud, limescale, I don’t know. Not sure how it got there. It was the size of a golf ball so more mass than I would expect from limescale. I used a strong acid to descale the toilet. I made the toilet sparkling clean.

Then I used the trap to clean a dread-lock style mop because I could stuff it in there and squeeze out the the grime. And the mop could also reach deeper into the trap to clean the toilet better. Toilet water would become instantly black but easy to flush and repeat. After 10 or so iterations the water was still gray so I gave up.. maybe the mop should be bleached.. so I put the mop away. The mop was previously used to clean up cat urine (neighbors cat keeps entering my house, peeing on the livingroom floor and stairs, then bailing.. does not hang-out [why mark in a territory it does not intend to use?]). Anyway, I did not defecate in the toilet after cleaning it. Maybe urinated a couple times over the span of a couple months.

Then out of the pure blue I find this creepy crawly. Should I bring this thing to a doctor? I cannot work out how it got there or if it came from me. Perhaps equally important are the sand grains (50 or so?) around it.

theory 1: it entered the cistern from the Brussels water supply, perhaps as an egg. Hatched in the cistern. Brussels water contains sand which builds up at the screens of the tap airators and also in the cistern. A typical flush does not bring any noticable sand into the toilet bowl, but maybe if a worm were in the cistern it would have moved the sand around so that a pinch of sand would go in a flush, along with the worm.

theory 2: it came in from the Brussels water supply and ended up in the sewer pipes like most of the water does, grew in the sewer pipes and crawled up into the toilet trap from the sewer side. As it crawled, sand and scum from the sewer pipe stuck to it and washed off it when it entered the trap.

theory 3: it came out of me and ended up in the sewer pipes and crawled into the toilet. No!!! I hope not. But if so, it’s the lower floor toilet that I use, so the worm would have to do a straight up vertical clime 1 story high inside of PVC. Seems unlikely.

theory 4: I leave the window open most of the time and the toilet seat up, so a bird could have flown in and dropped something in the toilet.

They all seem unlikely.

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/25102568

Efforts to eradicate the disfiguring mosquito-borne infection lymphatic filariasis are advancing, but it is still rife in 51 countries

Archived version: https://archive.li/q2b8x

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fglobal-development%2F2024%2Foct%2F25%2Fgenital-swelling-disease-mosquito-borne-infection-lymphatic-filariasis-hydrocele

4
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/33029459

cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/33029458

“Malaria is as old as Egyptian civilization itself, but the disease that plagued pharaohs now belongs to its history," said WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

5
6
 
 

Woah.. ho.. Gotta love that clickbait title. I’ll cut to the chase though- more research is needed before you can get roach milk on the shelf. From the article:

“But today we have no evidence that it is actually safe for human consumption.”

“Plus roaches aren't the easiest creatures to milk.”

7
 
 

Elevating the Culture of Blood Donation: A Call for Meaningful Incentives

Blood donation, an act that transcends mere charity, represents the quiet heroism that sustains modern healthcare. It is a selfless offering, an intimate gift of life passed from one human to another, often a stranger. And yet, despite its profound significance, donor rates continue to wane in the face of rising demand. As someone with a multifaceted background in psychology, healthcare, and business, I believe we must reimagine how we value and encourage blood donation, honoring its role in our collective well-being with the gravity it deserves.

The Psychological Imperative: Motivating Altruism through Thoughtful Engagement

Human behavior, when examined through the lens of psychology, reveals a complex interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Altruism, though noble, is not immune to the realities of modern life. Time constraints, fear, or a lack of personal connection to the cause can inhibit even the most well-meaning individuals from participating in blood donation efforts. Herein lies the challenge: How do we create incentives that not only encourage participation but also respect the enormity of the act?

Psychological studies on motivation suggest that incentives—when aligned with the personal values and emotional needs of individuals—can significantly influence behavior. However, the incentives we offer must do more than tokenize the act of giving blood. After all, donors are contributing something deeply personal, their very life force. To present them with a nominal reward—such as a $10 gift card—seems a stark undervaluation of their contribution. Instead, we must seek to inspire through incentives that resonate with the magnitude of the donation.

Medical Realities: Blood, A Priceless Resource with Tangible Costs

From a medical standpoint, blood is more than a precious fluid; it is a lifeline. A single unit, processed and administered, can mean the difference between life and death for multiple patients. Yet the economics of blood donation often remain hidden from public view. The cost of testing, processing, and delivering a half-liter of blood typically ranges from $200 to $400. This reality, however, is juxtaposed against the modest compensation most donors receive, creating a disconnect between the invaluable nature of the resource and the rewards offered to those who provide it.

As someone deeply acquainted with the medical field, I understand that the value of blood transcends financial measures. Yet the act of giving blood, the personal sacrifice made by the donor, should be met with a gesture that honors both the physical and emotional commitment of the individual. Here, my experience in business and advertising offers a pathway toward more meaningful recognition.

The Confluence of Business and Health: Redefining Value in Incentive Programs

In the realm of business, we understand that consumer engagement thrives on perceived value, and that participation is most often driven by the emotional resonance of an experience. Blood donation campaigns, though not a commercial enterprise, can benefit from this understanding. Rather than offering trivial rewards, we must craft incentives that speak to the heart of the donor’s contribution.

Nonprofits, often constrained by limited resources, need not rely on financial compensation alone to honor their donors. Instead, they can create community-centered experiences—opportunities for donors to connect with others who share their generosity. Imagine donor appreciation nights where participants gather for a shared meal, such as a pizza or barbecue dinner, followed by an outdoor movie screening beneath the stars. These events would provide more than a reward; they would offer a space for connection, reflection, and the cultivation of a shared sense of purpose.

A Vision for the Future of Public Health: Holistic and Humane Incentives

In reflecting on my diverse experiences across psychology, healthcare, and business, I see an opportunity for blood donation campaigns to evolve. It is time to embrace a holistic model of public health—one that recognizes not only the practical need for blood but also the profound emotional and social dimensions of the donation process. We must honor donors with incentives that reflect their sacrifice, not just in monetary terms but in the creation of meaningful, shared experiences.

Blood is not a commodity, nor should it be treated as such. It is the essence of life, and those who give it should be recognized accordingly. By rethinking the way we incentivize blood donation, we can cultivate a culture of gratitude, empathy, and collective responsibility. The future of public health rests not just in meeting immediate needs, but in inspiring individuals to become active participants in the ongoing narrative of human connection and care.

Let us rise to the occasion, offering incentives that are not only fair but awe-inspiring—reflecting the life-saving nature of the gift itself. In doing so, we elevate not only the act of giving blood but also the very spirit of humanity.

8
9
10
 
 

Four additional healthcare workers in Missouri who came in contact with a hospitalized bird flu patient developed mild respiratory symptoms but the virus was not confirmed in any of them, U.S. health officials said on Friday.

The report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention brings to six the number of healthcare workers who cared for the Missouri patient and developed respiratory symptoms.

Unlike previous U.S. bird flu cases this year, the Missouri patient, who was hospitalized on Aug. 22, had no known contact with infected animals. Scientists are watching closely for signs that the virus has begun to spread more easily in people.

11
12
 
 

cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/17030076

This is why I will confront anti-vaxxers in public.

Nearly 200 children died from influenza-related complications in the 2023-24 season, according to the CDC. Most of these children were eligible for a vaccine but did not receive one. The CDC reported that only 53% of children aged 6 months to 17 years were vaccinated this season, down from 56% the previous season. Vaccination rates were notably lower among Black children and those in rural areas.

13
14
15
16
17
 
 

TL;DW: There are potential risks and potential benefits, and strategies to mitigate the risks. More research is needed, YMMV.

18
19
20
21
 
 
22
 
 
23
24
25
 
 

cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/15495672

Routine childhood vaccinations will have prevented hundreds of millions of illnesses, tens of millions of hospitalizations and more than 1 million deaths among people born between 1994 and 2023, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A new report, published Thursday by the CDC, analyzed the benefits of routine childhood immunizations in the United States through the CDC’s Vaccines for Children Program, which launched in 1994. The research also found that the vaccinations saved the country billions of dollars.

view more: next ›