Ask Lemmygrad

1005 readers
2 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
51
 
 

Such as Wang Huning(王沪宁),Zhang Yibing(张一兵),Guo Jicheng(郭继承),Sun Xiguo(孙熙国),Tian Chenshan(田辰山)

52
 
 

It seems so many people understand a stateless classless society as being, basically, a commune scaled up. That's obviously not the case, but I can't figure out how exactly it would be administered, would there be some analogous form of police?

53
 
 

Was he a brutal dictator, or was he (somehow) not?

54
55
 
 

Anti-communist writers Jung Chang and Jon Halliday assert in their highly controversial 2006 book Mao: The Unknown Story that the Nationalist general Zhang Zhizhong was a Soviet agent who, following the Marco Polo Bridge incident in July 1937, had been tasked by Stalin with escalating the already tense situation with Japan into a full-scale, all-out war.

Stalin ordered this, Chang and Halliday maintain, because he (quite reasonably) feared Japanese aggression against his own country and wanted to draw China and Japan (both of which were hostile towards the USSR) into a costly war with one-another in order to weaken them both. This certainly was the approach he took towards Germany in 1939 after the failure of collective security, so it's not without precedent (or postedent?). In addition, Zhang himself was a strong communist sympathiser who would later defect to Mao's side during the Civil War and serve in his government.

According to Chang and Halliday, Zhang deliberately escalated the situation by orchestrating the Ōyama incident (the killing of two Japanese soldiers in Shanghai) and spreading misinformation to the media about the Japanese attacking the city. This was done in order to pressure Chiang into giving him the greenlight to attack the Japanese garrison there, as Chiang wasn't nearly as gung ho about the whole idea.

The ensuing battle, in which over 700,000 Chinese troops faced off against 300,000 Japanese, saw the decimation of Chiang's army. It resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives (including Chiang's most elite German-trained troops) and the capture of both Shanghai and eventually Nanking.

What do you think? Is this some crazy crackpot idea invented to demonise Stalin, Mao, and communism as a whole; or might it have some basis in reality?

56
 
 

The movie, as is obvious to anyone who has even read it's Wikipedia page, seems to be a pretty obvious critique of capitalism. The problem is the solution the movie finds for the problems of capitalism. It wants the head, the ruling class, and the hands, the working class, to be mediated and united by the heart. If you've brushed on the history of fascist movements in the early 20th century this should be incredibly familiar to you. It promotes a "resolution of class conflict" not that dissimilar to the corporatism that was espoused by Mussolini or the many petty dictatorships of the Americas and eastern Europe.

57
58
59
60
 
 

Edit: if you only have the clip, please upload it to tankie.tube and share it with me

61
62
63
64
 
 

The criminal court system in the US seems incredibly unjust and results in the criminalization of many activities which ought to be basic rights. It railroads innocent and completely functioning people into the morally bankrupt prison system where they are put into dehumanizing circumstances and extreme scrutiny that gives prison authorities more excuses to add charges and prison time, continuing the cycle further.

"Defendants" - itself a backwards term in the context of presumption of innocence - are unable to defend themselves using their own brains, knowledge and skills because of the incredibly confusing and non-intuitive procedure and rules in the court. Unless they are a lawyer themselves, they must either hire or be assigned a professional by the court to work on their behalf, but those lawyers often have incentives that stop them from fully embracing the defendant's interests. For example the lawyer knows she must return to the court and work with the same judge and possibly the same prosecutors again, and therefore she wants to make sure she appears professional and makes arguments that are acceptable by court standards. Lawyers will often tell their clients that either the client goes along with the plan set by the law team or they find a new team to represent them, which results in a loss of agency for the client who may be facing decades in jail and never gets a chance to actually voice their opinion.

Judges, lawyers, court staff and police work closely together and form personal bonds that can often work against the defendant. Judges can make sweeping judgements in lower courts and bench trials based on pure opinion. Judges and even juries are legally allowed to be biased against defendants for actions in court that has nothing to do with the charges.

This is just a few things I've noticed from watching trials, but it is difficult to find any other opinions on these topics, at least on the internet, because it seems to be so skewed in favor of the court system. I cannot find much of anything offering the sort of criticisms that I've offered above in printed format. I'm open to the idea that I've just completely misunderstood and that these things are somehow fair, but I'm just not seeing it. Please tell me if you disagree with anything I've said and explain why because I want to understand why this is considered justice.

Have any Marxists written about similar topics? What would a good socialist "justice system" look like? Are there / were there socialist countries that have decent models? What differences would Marxists ideally want to implement to change the criminal court system? Would they abolish it altogether, and if so, what stage of communism would that occur?

Any thoughts you have are appreciated. Thanks

65
 
 

Tried to cross-Post from Hexbear. Doesn't work well with Jerboa.

I don't really have a specific question, I'm just wondering how Laos is. Do people have any thoughts, interesting facts, or information about it?

So the context is that I've been doing a re-watch of King of the Hill, where Hank's neighbor is Laotian, at the same time I've been listening to the latest season of Blowback, which is about the area formerly known as French Indochina, but more specifically Cambodia and Vietnam. They don't really talk about Laos much, which makes sense.

In King of the Hill though, there's a couple references to a communist dictatorship in Laos. I just finished an episode where a former guerilla veteran is trying to recruit Laotians in the US to go back and fight this government. One of the funny parts to me, is that whether that government is bad or good but poor as a result of historical conditions, I see Kahn as the kind of person who would be wooed away to the USA with Hollywood images of the American Dream. He seems to work hard, but is obsessed with status, success, and commodities. Anyway, it's not a political show, so combined with that Blowback season, it's just enough information to get me curious lol.

I could review Wikipedia but it tends to be biased against communist nations, and I'd rather supplement boring scrolling of articles with interesting conversations. Especially since it's in the same general area as one of the most based communist parties I've studied so far (in Vietnam) and probably the worst one I've studied so far (the Khmer Rouge).

66
 
 

I heard rumors of them wanting to declare war on each other

67
 
 
68
 
 
69
 
 
70
 
 

I am watching Portuguese news right now and there is a very angry debate going on between Luís Montenegro and André Ventura.

I cannot understand what they are saying really but it seems that Portugal is having an election due to “conflict of interest” regarding Montenegro’s family business. My Vavó said something about the PM’s wife but even she is confused about it. I find it funny that they’re having these two right-wing dudes go off on each other on TV but nothing for the PCP-CDU.

I’ve tried to explain to my Vavó that the Ventura guy sucks but it’s difficult to get a handle on things (she thinks he has good points on calling the current PM a liar). Isn’t he also a fan of Salazar? Is Portuguese media trying to drum up more support for CHEGA?

I am always worried about Portugal and since it’s the day before April 25th (anniversary of the Carnation Revolution) I’m a bit more antsy.

71
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29024092

Edit: Found it

72
73
74
 
 

Sticking to your stereotype = treated like a doormat

Breaking your stereotype = whites get threatened and lash you

What's the winning move? To not play at all and just go back to China?

75
view more: ‹ prev next ›