this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
2077 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
2077
uBlock Origin developer recommends switching to Firefox as Chrome flags the extension (github.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 63 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Avoid chromium browsers

[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t like or use brave for multiple reasons but why is the fact that it's built on chromium a problem?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because every browser is becoming 3 chromes in a trench coat.

Long term this will be an issue.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are doing what Apple has done to browsers on iPhones. It’s all safari all the way down… lol

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ironically, Apple forcing Safari on iPhones is the single greatest thing standing between Chromium and total market domination.

Not that it's a good thing for Apple users, but it's the one remaining reason not to slap a "Not on Chromium? Don't bother visiting" sign on every website. Us Firefox users don't matter, statistically speaking

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Fuck. I hadn’t even thought of that perspective. You are totally right.

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Link is borked, add another ) at the end

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Works fine for me and has the ), what are you using to look at it?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_(web_browser)#Browsers_based_on_Chromium

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This link works for me but the previous has the same broken link. I'm using the Sync android client. ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

The 1st opens a link to the wiki page: Chromium (web browser

Missing the ending ) for me

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Odd so it does not like the link getting renamed then.