this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
394 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The “interview” is just cover.

My bet is Putin is vetting Tucker Carlson for Trump’s running mate.

Once Tucker kisses the ring, and likely commits a crime (or other misdeeds) on Putin’s orders (to serve as puppet-string kompromat for Putin’s plans), Putin will give the blessing for Trump to announce Tucker Carlson as his VP running mate.

Then, just imagine a 2028 Presidential bid from Tucker (win or lose in ‘24)…

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Nah, Cucker seems to be fitting well into his role as Goebbels 2.0

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

If I want to watch someone give Putin a softjob, I can always watch Oliver Stone's interviews.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The rumors were correct? Holy shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Great, Tucker Carlson isn't done being in the headlines so he's going full Johnny Knoxville and is planning on taking a sludge hammer to the nuts. Thanks fox.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

That’s what the kids are calling a sloppy BJ with an angry rimjob these days?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 8 points 9 months ago

Is this like a managerial review of his boss or something? Stupid HR probably gonna throw little tucker a pizza party.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If anybody wants to view some less biased Interview with Putin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Putin_Interviews

Of course Putin is a sociopath and excellent liar. But he's not a raving Hitler foaming at the mouth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Oh yeah, two aging psychopaths jerking each other off with their respective victim narratives for an hour untill they cum hotnabd creamy bullshit all over the screen... Sounds very appealing this interview

[–] OofN@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Fucking yikes, I don’t know what else to say.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It would be a mighty shame if the interview broadcast experienced a distributed denial of service attack, wouldn't it? Thankfully for Putin, the west is above such chicanery and would never dream of screwing their opponents over like that.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Dear Putin, me ole mucker, please send Carlson to fight for you in Ukraine. Cheers.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Ah so that's what Cucker is up to

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›