Asklemmy

43843 readers

689 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is it possible to merge two existing communities on different federated servers? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by g7s@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I believe more and more people will escape to lemmy sooner or later, and I already see 3 different communities for the same thing (selfhosted) here on lemmy. Time will tell which one will be the most active, but lets assume all of them will be equally active and the desire emerges to combine the two communities about the same thing, is that something possible or intended to be possible with federated services?

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this is currently one of the biggest problem of Lemmy on the UX department. Non technical users from Reddit will only expect one "subreddit" for a theme, but if they search on Lemmy, they'll find more than one community with the same topic, and it'll confuse them and make them less likely to come back.

But that's the way how Fediverse work, so I don't think combining two communities should be done from the Fediverse side, but rather each Lemmy instance can curate a "playlist" or "multireddit" that has some of the biggest communities from the users' server and other federated servers about the same topic, and users can subscribe to the "playlist" rather than individual community.

[–] g7s@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "multireddit" aspect also makes sense to me. Thank you for elaborating an alternative approach to what I had in mind. I don't know if such a feature is yet implemented, but for the time being, one could just subscribe to all the communities and it will be fine.

[–] blob42@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What would be nice is to have a system of tags or keywords that can be defined for a community. It would be trivial then to build a sort of multireddit where multiple communities can be aggregated by the tags they belong to.

[–] DudePluto@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, reddit really isn't much better in this department. It's not uncommon for multiple subs to exist for the same userbase (r/memes vs r/dankmemes, r/christian vs r/truechristian). Over time users figure out which is which, which is the main one, and which is for them

[–] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but they are all with different names, and they are not completely the same (as in different rules, more specific topic vs general topic, etc). But on Lemmy there is a possibility that two communities having the same exact topic and name for example !technology@beehaw.org and !technology@lemmy.ml, they are both discussing technology (and not any specific difference between them).

[–] Ada@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@SafetyGoggles The difference between those two is the moderation policies of the instance. Beehaw doesn't federate with the same instances that lemmy.ml does, and has an explicitly more inclusive and less generalist approach. They both cover the same ground, but you couldn't just merge them.

Having said that, it would be nice to see a user level feature that lets end users combine communities in to one "virtual" community in their interface.

@g7s @DudePluto

[–] wesley_cook@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The down side of that would probably be duplicated content. Like if some major news happens for a topic reposts can already be really annoying and usually need moderator action to combine threads. Then there'd be that times however many communities exist for that same topic.

[–] SafetyGoggles@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, that's exactly what I mean. Coverung the same ground, but they are different communities with different moderation, so it can't be merged, but it make sense to group them together and view it as a "playlist". Just like Whitney Houston and ABBA don't collaborate to make albums, but it make sense for their songs to exist together in a playlist called "Songs from the 80s".