this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
455 points (94.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30723 readers
1489 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

~~Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion~~

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] needthosepylons@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (14 children)
  • Anyone who says 'science doesn't care about your feelings' likely has a very limited understand of science
  • There should be no prison but no penal system altogether
  • Vote, don't vote, do whatever the hell you want but don't shove it into people's face
  • Aiming to be politically 100% pure and judging those who can't be as pure boils down to chasing political activism cookies/elo. The only useful thing is doing one's best.
[–] Firipu@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How would you deal with violent crimes (murder, rape, abuse, things that are considered morally reprehensible by most people, regardless of religion and affiliation) without a penal system? Mob punishment?

[–] needthosepylons@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would suggest this article as an introduction to penal abolition.

But, to sum some common abolitionist answers, I would say :

  • Replace the penal system with an appropriately modified version of civil law (Hulsmann)
  • Transformative justice (focus on the needs of the victim, apply peer pressure and other non segregative means of social control on the perpetrator, while taking in account the needs of said perpetrator) (Ruth Morris, Mariam Kana)
  • Community mediation with a fallback segregative solution (Christie)
  • Tackling the needs of the population to reduce violent crime (all of them)
  • The list goes on and on! I can point you to other resources if you're interested.
[–] Disinformation_Bot@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Here's a more easily readable version that doesn't require a download:

https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728496

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Restorative justice programs have been implemented in Indigenous Canadian communities with higher success than the existing contemporary justice system. With high recursion and incarceration rates for indigenous people, those programs address the root of crime without punishment while still holding perpetrators accountable. Most importantly, it's done in a way that seeks to support rather than re-victimize those affected by crime.

I absolutely agree with the abolishionist movement but hadn't known till now that it was large scale and worldwide. I agree with the changes being made locally without understanding the whole philosophy, basically. Thanks for giving me a good reason to learn more about it.

[–] needthosepylons@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My pleasure, really! Ruth Morris and Kaba are, for me, the two insisting the most on the link between first nations practices of restauration and possible ways to start an abolitionniste strain from there, if you're interested in these..

As for the movement in general, it started to grow in the 60's. Mainly driven by professors of law and critical criminology, on the one side, prisoners movements and unions on the other side. A great deal of anarchists, a lot of religious people, a few moral radicalists. Many had a common experience of nazi camps. That may be too simple of an explanation, but some of them explicitly state that to account for their interest in prison and hatred for the penal system.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I appreciate that. I'm going to see if there's anything published on/by them at my local library. (not sarcastic I love the library)

load more comments (12 replies)