this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
485 points (92.9% liked)

ADHD memes

10096 readers
1042 users here now

ADHD Memes

The lighter side of ADHD


Rules

  1. No Party Pooping

Other ND communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
485
Theory (lazysoci.al)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al to c/adhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schorsch@feddit.org 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

FUCK

You can say fuck on the Internet!
For fucks sake.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

Cussing is a goddamn dirty habit and you should cut that fucking shit out.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

no u cant the lemmy cuss brigade will arrest u, my uncle said so and he works at nintendo

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 1 day ago

idk if working at nintendo is a fitting punishment for saying fuck

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

My Nintendo works for U.N.C.L.E.

[–] Schorsch@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Joke's into him: I'm into it.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Filtering swear words is a dark path the masses are willfully following. It's a subtle way to see if they can use AI to force us to change how we speak to align with a worldview. People need to fucking resist it.

[–] Schorsch@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Interesting take. Care to elaborate what role AI plays in this context? Recognizing swear words in image files, I guess?

Also I'm willfully using more swear words on Lemmy if it means they won't farm my comments for training their fucking piss shit AI without my goddamn consent. Horsefuckers!

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's using AI to filter or reduce interactions with words puritans and Chinese censors find "offensive" but to the other responses point, it goes deeper. They train the AI not to cuss, not to be able to discuss sex at all, and to avoid topics that the developers' companies or countries don't like. But we're never shown what they push for or are guarded from by the companies releasing them, so the shift is subtle.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

May I ask what "Chinese censors" have to do with anything? It's completely feasible to me that this is an all-American problem, imposed on us for the sake of brand friendliness; same as it's been for other instances of censorship like network censors on television or the YouTube adpocalypse; and carried over into our language now more generally to end up in a place like lemmy. It's perfectly explained by the attitudes and surface-level friendliness of "polite society" in western culture. I don't see the point in using a foreign adversary to explain it away, or pretending that censorship is anything different when it's done by a government vs private entities that shouldn't have that kind of unchecked authority over what we're allowed to communicate in the first place. I also have no reason to believe China gives any fucks about the vulgarity of English speakers on the English internet. It just seems weird to me to bring them up here.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The underlying tech doesn't care about swear words. But, from what I hear, the "AI" models and interfaces that are being marketed for general use have been intentionally trained not to emit such words, and may even be blinded to those words by their creators. I haven't verified it, but supposedly adding "fucking" to your Google / Bing search query will completely disable their "AI" generated results, e.g.

[–] Tigrafale@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

Don't fucking say that word please