meowMix2525

joined 2 years ago
[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Everything's bigger in Texas...

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

It's a pun, it's not supposed to be laugh out loud funny. It takes you a second to get it and then you groan and tell the orator to fuck off.

I like it because it will live inside the head of car brains who actually care that much about make and model even though we're all still on the same page and it literally doesn't matter.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

This is like when I found out about the Budweiser horses

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I appreciate the semi-alliteration between "ford-dod-ger" and "dodge-char-ger". Don't read it like a make/model but as a descriptive term (the syllabic stress changes a bit) and it makes a little more sense.

...and I've analyzed the joke to death now. You're welcome!

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don't think they did, the make and model is in the headline of one of their links and they take specific issue with this particular vehicle. And it's true, the dodge brand attracts a lot of asshole drivers that weave through traffic. The misnaming is deliberate and tongue-in-cheek.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I didn't get it at first either but it's definitely a clever play on words referring to dodge chargers being driven by reckless drivers, i.e. used to "dodge" other vehicles including fords.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Were you under any illusion that when they said one they didn't mean the other?

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It will never not be funny that these people care so much about fake internet points, and think other people care about those internet points enough to ??? follow them around and downvote them?? Downvote lots of comments at once?? In a way that is somehow different from normal browsing behavior??

Like they're not even tallied here like they are in the bad place, I genuinely don't get it. Please drop the word bRiGaDiNg from your lexicon, I promise that absolutely nothing will change except you'll be slightly less online and much better off for it. Sometimes you will get downvoted, and that's okay. The world is not out to get you, even if it has a scary .ml next to its name and practices obscure forms of witchcraft like dialectical materialism.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You can get these as thc edibles in some places

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think auto pilot works how you seem to think it does...

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought it was xylitol?

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do that with cheese, sausage, and crackers. Like a low effort charcuterie board. But I get tired of it pretty frequently, which makes it entirely unappetizing to me. Like I'd rather not eat and just be hungry if that's my only option. So I have to rotate.

Right now my easy meal is canned soup.

 

I've noticed that inline images will render to fill the available width of the comment they're on. This is much too large for some images, such as emotes that only have so many pixels to display and thus get blown out and fuzzy. I would much prefer inline images to render in their native resolution up until they reach the width of the comment. Is there already a way to change this behavior or is it not something that has been implemented?

view more: next ›