this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
35 points (92.7% liked)

Open Source

31111 readers
335 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astro_ray@lemdro.id 14 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I feel like one of thr problem is LLMs hijacked the definition of AI. Like another comment said, the way they trained on copyrighted material, it's probably not possible. But imagine there was another model (not necessarily LLM) and it was trained with completely public domain material. For example maybe something trained to find genetic diseases from genetic samples of a person, or detecting asteroids from telescope images. Those could become open source. Now, I am not an expert, but do we consider those AI?

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean you could a still do generative AI on voices of actors in really old movies that are in the public domain

[–] astro_ray@lemdro.id 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Exactly what I wanted to say. Anything on public domain; movies, books, pictures and paintings should be fair game. Including any databases that allows the uses of it in the given context.

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 2 points 3 months ago

Public domain audiobooks too like LibriVox!

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah that's a lot of data

load more comments (1 replies)