Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2308 readers

10 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

blahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone

supakaity@lemmy.blahaj.zone

ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

185

Admin update - Hexbear Defederated (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/main@lemmy.blahaj.zone

286 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is an admin post, intended for blahaj lemmy users. Top level posts from members of other instances will be removed.

Edit - Hexbear announced plans to deferedate from us.

~~After recent events, it feels to me that sentiment has shifted and more people are asking for defederation of hexbear than previously~~

~~I've been doing my best to try and mend bridges and keep us connected, as it's my hope that we can maintain trans solidarity and work with them, despite the friction, however, ultimately, I feel that this is an issue for the blahaj lemmy community to decide, not the admins alone~~

~~So here's what we're going to do~~

~~We're going to leave things as they are for a week. That will give time for things to calm down whilst we see if we can work together. After a week, I'll put up a vote and get a feel for where the community is at in regards to our continued federation with hexbear. That poll will run for a week. If there is a strong will to defederate (a clear majority), then that's what we will do~~

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] C4RC0S4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I do want to say that user level instance blocking is in the works: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/3869

[–] MrZee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not a GitHub user, although I’ve done some browsing of open issues. Am I seeing that this feature has been coded (or is actively being coded) or am I just seeing that people are still discussing the issue?

I ask because last time I looked (probably 2-4 weeks ago), I saw some discussion on the issue dating back to over a year ago, but nothing that looked like actual traction on it getting implemented.

[–] wupasscat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its a pull request so its probably at least mostly complete

[–] MrZee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for that. Looking again, I see now at the top that I’m looking at pull requests and not “issues”. And because I don’t really know, I just looked up what pull requests are:

Pull requests let you tell others about changes you've pushed to a branch in a repository on GitHub. Once a pull request is opened, you can discuss and review the potential changes with collaborators and add follow-up commits before your changes are merged into the base branch.

So that means that code has been written and requested to be merged into the main branch. Does that mean it’s already been tested in a non-main branch and is (hopefully) ready for prime time after some final review?

[–] wupasscat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, assuming the code is ready (im not very good at programming so idk) the owners of the repository just have to merge those commits and the feature will end up in a subsequent release

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)