this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
603 points (99.0% liked)

Games

16834 readers
900 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@lemmy.world 114 points 3 months ago (50 children)

As long as whales keep buying stuff they'll keep putting microtransactions in games. Start making fun of people that buy skins and horse armor and maybe people will stop buying shit that has no value.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 66 points 3 months ago (22 children)

horse armor

OG gamers remember how this all started. We got what the whales deserve.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It didn't start with horse armor. And even then, while clearly stupid, it wasn't egregious in the way modern mtx is. It was just a poorly priced optional cosmetic DLC. Modern mtx is a whole other beast, where companies use every psychological trick in the book to get people addicted to gambling.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not gonna dispute this but horse armor has a cache

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, it had like an inventory functionality? I love Oblivion, but I obviously didn't get the armor and don't remember the details. I suspect it also provided defense for the horse? In that case it's almost approaching Assassin's Creed's "buy xp to skip grind" level of egregiousness, but still just a DLC.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

apologies... cache as in it was a meme with gamers about paying for it haha as it was a joke but here we are :/

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Could you please explain? Now I'm curious.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the internet was a real a place i would be able to pull article from the time period but search yields jack shit.

but here something now (2020) https://screenrant.com/oblivion-horse-armor-dlc-controversy-explained/

In 2006 - a year after the Xbox 360's launch - the term "microtransaction" wasn't even widely known. Instead, Oblivion's Horse Armor was just called "bad DLC." But it ended up kick-starting of one of gaming's most hated and most lucrative business tactics.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I didn't find any references to "cache". That's the part I want to understand, what the significance of that part of the joke. Why "cache"?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah, as in it provides respect? And sounds like cash? I know, I know, dissecting jokes is a lot of fun.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 months ago

A notable characteristic

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Horse armor was not cosmetic. It was armor.

Otherwise, spot-on. At least people who paid for horse armor got a whole new file for something that was not already in the damn game. Nowadays you're already looking at the thing, and you're getting gouged for the ability to say you have it.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)