this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
394 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Would be horrible if they went after our child porn

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't mind when they genuinely do go after child porn. But I suppose I'm not as principled about freedom of speech as some others

[–] skibidi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is always a tension between security, privacy, and convenience. With how the Internet works, there isn't really a way - with current technology - of reliably catching content like that without violating everyone's privacy.

Of course, there is also a lack of trust here (and there should be given the leaks about mass surveillance) that the 'stop child porn powers' would only be used for that and not simply used for whatever the powers that be wish to do with them.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

If we let Fediverse become unmoderared and rife with child porn then I'd be fine with them coming after it, is all I'm saying.