this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

318 readers
178 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just a handful of private companies control the majority of the U.S. freight rail network, leaving large swaths of the country with access to just one or two privatized railroads. The heavily concentrated rail industry's model of maintaining "supernormal profits" and delivering for shareholders by slashing investment, McDonald wrote, runs directly counter to public priorities, including expanded passenger service.

Amtrak, the United States' passenger rail corporation, is managed as a for-profit company and "runs passenger service on tracks that are typically owned by the private Class 1 railroads," McDonald observed. While private railroads are by law required to give preferential treatment to Amtrak's passenger trains over freight, "this has rarely been enforced," leading to often terrible performance.

Bringing the U.S. rail system under public ownership, the new report argues, would be transformational, allowing for greater investment in passenger and freight rail and thus helping to shift away from costly and heavily polluting on-road transportation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I live 85 miles from Albuquerque . There is a rail that goes through town. But to take the commuter train to the city I have to drive 55 miles. The same rail goes all the way to Denver, but to take a train from Albuquerque to Denver I have to go to Chicago.

[–] dunidane@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

I went to college in a town called college station. By the time I was a student public service had been shut down for 20 years. But we still had to put up with the mile long freight trains running right through the middle of town at rush hour grinding everything to a halt.

Now locals are fighting the idea of high-speed rail coming within a hundred miles of the city.

load more comments (2 replies)