this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
406 points (94.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7143 readers
181 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 56 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Call me radical, but I don't think any government should be killing people.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Do you think prisons are okay and killing isn't?

[–] Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the prisons are focused on rehabilitation and reintegration instead of just keeping people locked up and treating them like they're not human? Yes. Do I believe prisons in the US are like that? No.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Genuine question. What do you think should happen with people that have committed violent crimes? If they have no interest in voluntary rehabilitation, imprisonment with the goal of rehabilitation seems to be a better alternative to just letting them roam freely and do as they please. And it seems a lot better than the death penalty. Specifically for reasons like what we're seeing here. You can release someone from prison if evidence comes later that casts doubt on their guilt. It doesn't prevent the harm that has already been caused, but it gives them an opportunity to take back their life. You can't un-execute somebody.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Life is short. Why does anyone have to live after it's over?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)