self-explenatory ๐ฆ
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1358 points (98.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43950 readers
1130 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Failed. It asked for one duck.
What if this is a quantum duck that is simultaneously both two ducks, but also just one duck?
Then it proves none of us can observe, or it would have collapsed!
Also I feel The Quantum Duck should be a James Bond-esque spy, but a duck.
Damnit, physics wins again!
Okay, you now know what your next drawing target should be - get quacking!