this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
201 points (99.0% liked)

Programming

17503 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hunger@programming.dev 30 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Read the proposal: Lifetimes annotations, the rust standard library (incl. basic types like Vec, ARc, ...), first class tuples, pattern matching, destructive moves, unsafe, it is all in there.

The proposal is really to bolt on Rust to the side of C++, with all the compatibility problems that brings by necessity.

[–] Traister101 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Gonna need to start calling it C++++ at this point. So much extra shit in the standard library

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.

[–] Traister101 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of... cruft. Maybe don't plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, not saying C++ isn't cluttered.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)