Technology

59377 readers

3170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

218

Is it time to question the yearly release cycle for phones? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So recently I've been seeing the trend where Android OEMs such as Google, Samsung, etc. have been extending their software release times up to like five, six, and seven years after device release. Clearly, phone hardware has gotten to the point where it can support software for that long, and computers have been in that stage for a very long time. From what I can tell, the only OEM that does this currently might be Fairphone.

Edit: The battery is the thing that goes the fastest so manufacturers could just offer new batteries and that would solve a lot of the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 75 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

They could have always supported software for that long. They simply refused to.

There is no benefit to slowing the release cycle. All of the research gets done either way, all of the supply chain modifications get made either way, and as an individual you have no need to replace your phone every year. A multi-year release cycle does very little but screw over people who need a new phone during the wrong point in the release cycle, while also substantially complicating the supply chains by making demand much spikier.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Conservation wise there is a very big reason to slow down the release cycle

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, there isn't. People who are buying new phones every year are trading them in, and they're going to other people who are more price conscious.

Manufacturing several year old tech results in brand new hardware with a shorter life cycle. You're not going to get 5 or 10 years of updates on a phone that was 5 years behind tech advancement when you bought it.

The people chasing novelty would do so by jumping manufacturers instead, so you don't change their behavior at all.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

And like you said, sometimes you need to replace a phone.

Maybe it was lost, or destroyed.

load more comments (7 replies)