this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
446 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will bring forward a motion of non-confidence to bring down the Trudeau government in the next sitting of the House of Commons.

"The Liberals don't deserve another chance," Singh wrote in a letter on Friday. "That's why the NDP will vote to bring this government down."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Yeah, WTF is he thinking? At least wait until October after we've had a chance to put out the Trump fire a bit.

Hopefully it's a bluff to get Trudeau to resign, but that's not really the typical NDP MO.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 16 points 1 day ago (10 children)

WTF is he thinking?

For better or worse, he's probably reached the point where he thinks they need to cut all remaining ties to the Liberals, and not be seen as propping them up, formally or otherwise.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (8 children)

And that's worth a PP government? IMO he's lost the plot if that's his entire line of thinking.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm torn on this.

On the one hand, I agree that a PP government is a terrible thing.

On the other hand, it's hardly the NDP's job to prop up another political party.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You want a two-party system, then. That's pretty much the only way for parties to never work strategically.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No. That's not what they're saying at all.

The NDP is not in government. Trudeau did not form a coalition, he decided to form a single-party cabinet in a hung parliament. This is how this always plays out.If he wanted stability, he could have formed a coalition.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 9 hours ago

Formal coalition vs. informal support is a distinction without a difference, though.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, no.

I want a system that's actually designed to support multiple parties. Westminster ain't it.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Former British colonies are still suffering from the effects of first-past-the-post.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Somebody's always propping up another party if you're Germany or Norway or Spain, though, or you don't have a government. That's what I mean. We have something like 2.5 parties, so we're not used to it, but it's how it's "supposed" to work.

There's no formal coalition agreement, and I don't see Trudeau scrambling to offer cabinet posts to NDP MPs.

The less formal arrangement they had lasted a pretty long time, all things considered.

But Singh doesn't owe him anything.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)