this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
70 points (97.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8904 readers
704 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

NOW only it's finished? When did it become normal for these companies to release half finished trash and use their paying customers as beta testers?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Not too long after Minecraft blew up and they saw that people would willingly pay to play shit that's not finished.

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's one game that I never got into the hype train with and still haven't got around to trying, even though it looks like it's right up my alley. So I might be mistaken but wasn't Minecraft originally an indie effort? I don't like it but I can understand and appreciate giving indie devs support while they're still working on things a lot more than paying the mega corporation for the privilege of being a beta tester.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah, it was an indie thing, but it was also one of the first huge success stories from crowdfunding/early access, too. So in typical game's industry fashion, they copied it; but only the parts that make them more money for less effort.

load more comments (1 replies)