this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
54 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

1626 readers
522 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Im just gonna say that Bytedance reluctance to sell their brainrot inducing app tells me everything about their intentions. They could sell it for stock and still benefit from its growth. But they won’t do it, I wonder why?

Fuck the CCP.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This is from my former coworker who's father was approached as an investor for Bytedance, so grain of salt.

But apparently the current CEO of Bytedance, Shou Zi Chew, interned at Meta and offered Zuckerberg a chance to invest into Bytedance in 2013 when he was gathering investors (assuming they'd be the American arm of the multinational). Zuck refused, saying that he didn't think short form video is going to go anywhere, and basically laughed Zi Chew out of the room.

Fast forward to 2024, and Meta is spending the most money lobbying to get Tiktok to sell to a US company, with Meta trying to argue that they have the best infrastructure to "manage the technology" and data from Tiktok, Capcut, Lemon8, etc.

If all of this is true, I would also say "Fuck You" to Mark Cuckerberg and shut down the servers too. I mean, why the hell else am I on Lemmy if not for a CEO saying I can't have my app?

edit: Oh how did I forget, Zuck was trying to buy Musical.ly in 2016, learned Mandarin, went to China to kiss CPC ass, and still got blocked on the buy by Bytedance.. It's 100% personal for everyone involved here.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Even if this were true they could still sell to anyone else. I’m still not convinced that the CCP doesn’t sees TikTok being more valuable as a cultural weapon than as a simple social media. Hell getting it banned is probably as good in their eyes as it staying because it creates more tension between citizens and the government and they’re all about creating instability.