this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

45214 readers
996 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What was it about and what made you argue for so long? Did you win, did it conclude in anyway?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I had a multi-week long argument with someone on Reddit who was convinced that racism is irrelevant and/or doesn't exist because it's a distraction from class warfare or something.

I argued that yes, the rich are screwing us over, but racism still exists and is bad and you shouldn't be racist.

They made responses that were at least 3x as long as mine. They didn't really ever say anything new, except to say that my points were wrong because class warfare. After they went on a rant in response to my comment to the effect of "it's still not nice to pretend racism doesn't exist", I lost hope with this person.

I started replying to them by mentioning something they said, then followed it up by copy-pasting some of my previous comments to them. I didn't even read their essays. I started pawning off my replies to ChatGPT, and they'd reply every time. Unless they were also using an LLM and telling it to include typos and stuff, it looked like they were still vehemently arguing with me/ChatGPT.

After a few weeks of almost daily replies, I gave a two-sentence reply where I admitted that I wasn't even reading their replies because I thought their opinion was nonsense and the "conversation" had been going nowhere.

I didn't get a reply to that comment.

[–] Magnus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny because racism is a classic way to neuter class war

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just going to assume you're not a racist looking for an excuse to downplay racism

[–] Magnus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you talking to me? I said that racism was traditionally used as a tool to divide working class movements so anti racism and class war go hand in hand. Trying to have one without the other is a classic way to divide working people against each other. Pretty weird how you read what I wrote and assumed I’m a racist.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You might've missed the word "not" in my previous comment, lol

EDIT: My apologies if I misread your intention -- I'd entertained the idea that someone would try to goad me into an argument on the same topic, so I didn't get invested in thinking too much about your comment.

Another commenter clued me in as to what you were probably getting at, and I think we're in agreement, lol

[–] Magnus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

It’s fine I wasn’t very clear with my reply so I see how it could be misconstrued. You’re clearly still traumatised from the original argument lol.

load more comments (3 replies)