this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
971 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A survey of more than 2,000 smartphone users by second-hand smartphone marketplace SellCell found that 73% of iPhone users and a whopping 87% of Samsung Galaxy users felt that AI adds little to no value to their smartphone experience.

SellCell only surveyed users with an AI-enabled phone – thats an iPhone 15 Pro or newer or a Galaxy S22 or newer. The survey doesn’t give an exact sample size, but more than 1,000 iPhone users and more than 1,000 Galaxy users were involved.

Further findings show that most users of either platform would not pay for an AI subscription: 86.5% of iPhone users and 94.5% of Galaxy users would refuse to pay for continued access to AI features.

From the data listed so far, it seems that people just aren’t using AI. In the case of both iPhone and Galaxy users about two-fifths of those surveyed have tried AI features – 41.6% for iPhone and 46.9% for Galaxy.

So, that’s a majority of users not even bothering with AI in the first place and a general disinterest in AI features from the user base overall, despite both Apple and Samsung making such a big deal out of AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

It would have to have a 'use' to qualify as anything else. It takes longer to ask it to do anything than it does to just do it yourself. Plus they want you to call it up by their retard brand name, 'hey, gemini' or 'okay, google' is cringey AF.

I cant wait until you get dumb siri for free but it only tells time and the paid version cost 25 a month but it also sets alarms.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

Downvoted for casual use of a slur.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

If you're talking about retard, what would you prefer i use and how long until that word becomes a slur? You know it wasn't long ago retard was the polite term, and mongoloid before that. It doesn't matter what word you use, if the meaning has negative connotations, some asshole like you decides to take their turn at policing speech to the benifit of nobody.

In any case, I think you're you're wasting your time.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck off, retard was never polite. I was there, the term was retarded mental development. Then assholes like you took the use of retard by doctors as permission to use it as an insult. Implying that it is something bad that makes a person be less valuable. It was pieces of shit that thought the same as you who turned it into an insult and made it so the medical world had to change terms, again. You are the only waste of time around here.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

Copy/paste from wikipedia

Retard was previously used as a medical term. The verb "to retard" means 'to delay or hold back', and so "retard" became known as a medical term in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to describe children with intellectual disabilities, or retarded mental development.[5] For context, until the 1960s, the terms moron, idiot, cretin, and imbecile were all genuine, non-offensive terms used, including by psychiatrists, to refer to people with ment

I'll take that before I take your 'I was there' bs, you were there after that you imbecile.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It became a slur back when I was a child in the 90s because people used it as a general perjorative. Doesn't help that it once innocently described a vulnerable minority. When cunts like you decided to use it as a slur, they tied said vulnerable minority to the concept of "this thing is bad" and harmed that community.

I'm not policing your speech. I'm calling you a cunt for using a decidedly shitty term that's been shitty for decades.

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Great, well I dont buy any of your arguments as genuine as they might seem, i think you just like feeling superior. So enjoy knowing i dont care.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Never thought you would. The comment wasn't really for you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)