this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
895 points (85.4% liked)

Antiwork

8297 readers
15 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (11 children)

"Hello, I would like to benefit from society without contributing to it"

[–] cubedsteaks 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there are ways to contribute that aren't 40+ hours a week.

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And I'm not seeing a single comment in here that is saying otherwise.

[–] cubedsteaks 5 points 1 year ago

It's called helping each other.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The AntiWork movement already peaked so I’m not sure what the Lemmy instance is trying to accomplish.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your position is simply that people need to work less, you're doing a very bad job of relaying that, and thus shooting yourself in both feet.

[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I hate to admit this, but I agree. My qualm isn't with the message that we ought to work less. That's smart. Why shouldn't we live in a society where we can have a fulfilling lifestyle without endless soul crushing work?

My qualm is with the wording. The implication is that one should consent to work, but really work is a fundamental truth. Take away the facade of society and all we have is our struggle to survive the elements and find food, i.e. work.

load more comments (8 replies)